Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,972 of 72,318    |
|    Bret Cahill to All    |
|    Re: Retro Button Would Further Automatio    |
|    17 Mar 19 13:52:04    |
      From: bretcahill@aol.com              > > Put the fuselage inside of 2 counter rotating fans and the core engines in       tandem inside of the fuselage, geared together in case one engine fails like       the Osprey. The engine room would split the cabin area in two displacing a       few dozen seats so the        wide body version would have a for cabin and an aft cabin, bathrooms and crews       etc.       >        > So a helicopter then.              Fixed wings don't provide the lift for a helicopter in any stage of flight.              Like the Osprey the fixed wings provide lift in horizontal flight, but       obviously not in VTOL mode.              Unlike the Osprey the fans/props do not change orientation relative to the       fuselage after takeoff. Instead the entire fuselage rotates to the horizontal       for horizontal flight.              The passengers and pilot are tits up on take off and landing.              Another advantage:              The wings are not designed around the inelegant discontinuity of the engine       weight.               > These don't have the greatest safety record in       > general.              > > 4. Increased Safety. If a fan blade snaps off it can't impale any       passengers or critical structures.       >        > Shedding a fan blade leads to rapid destruction of turbines caused by       > loss of balance anyway.              Much much less of an issue with larger ductless fans.              1. Imbalance forces increase with the square of rpm times dia. A 3X larger       dia. fan has one third the imbalance for the same tip speed and same mass       loss. (1/3)^2 X 3 = 1/3.              2. The tip speed will be less. The whole point of high by pass is high mass       flow rate but at lower speed for higher propulsion efficiency at take off.        Take off is where they are wasting all the fuel.              3. 3X more blades can be packed on a larger annular fan. If one comes off it       creates 1/3rd the imbalance as a similar fan with 1/3rd the number of blades.              4. Without ducting, no impacts on other blades. the lost blade easily clears       the swept wing which isn't going as fast forward as the blade is traveling       away from the plane.              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2JKBabvx44&t=2s               Ā§ 33.94. Based on a margin of safety (MS) analysis, the most critical       compressor, turbine or fan blade at its maximum permissible rotating speed       must be contained by the casings while the engine should operate continuously       for at least 15 s.               https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100093611200009X                     Bret Cahill              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca