From: pallison49@gmail.com   
      
    Andy wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > I would think in terms of overall costs, that nimh would be   
   > cheaper than buying alkaline aaa batteries.   
   >   
      
    ** Then you would be thinking wrong.   
      
   It is ONLY in high usage and high current applications that re-chargeables   
   come out the winner.   
      
   For items like remotes, clocks, DMMs, rarely used torches and any low usage   
   item - forget NiMH cells.   
      
      
      
   > It would help me find relevant replies if so many were not littered with   
   arguments and cussing.   
      
      
   * It would help even more if the half witted, half baked trolls who think they   
   own the NG would kindly piss off.   
      
      
      
   ....   Phil   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)