Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 71,295 of 72,318    |
|    Bret Cahill to All    |
|    Re: Retro Button Would Further Automatio    |
|    27 Jun 19 15:41:20    |
      From: bretcahill@aol.com              > Put a retro or "my kingdom for a horse" switch on anything that seems       unnecessarily over automated or when the additional sophistication is of a       minor advantage.       >       > If anything doesn't seem perfect, tap the retro switch and you are back to       flying by the seat of your pants or at least something that is less       complicated / more proven technology.       >       > It may seem counter intuitive but this would actually _further_ automation       and sophistication by taking some of the pressure off the designers trying to       get every unanticipated situation right the first time.       >       > It may also reduce some of the concerns about AI.       >       > It's astounding this isn't SOP in every design engineering dept.              Not sure of the hold up here. Has anyone heard of any active patents on retro       buttons?              "The issue, which surfaced during FAA simulator testing, concerns the ability       of pilots to quickly reassert control of the plane if an automated flight       handling system pushes the plane downward, said a person familiar with the       matter."              https://news.yahoo.com/us-faa-boeing-must-address-issue-737-max-052756185.html              Just put the retro button in and call it a day.                     Bret Cahill              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca