Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 71,314 of 72,318    |
|    Phil Allison to Tom Gardner Fuckwit Asshole Pig    |
|    Re: Frequency counter    |
|    16 Jul 19 16:07:41    |
      From: pallison49@gmail.com              Tom Gardner Fuckwit Asshole Pig wrote:              > >>       > >> Work out what you want to achieve, and only then work out how to achieve       > >> it. Frequency counters are nice for timenuts but nowadays different       > >> instruments are often better.       > >>       > >       > >       > > ** A standard frequency counter is an indispensable piece of workshop gear.       > >       > > By "standard" I mean one covering the range from 1Hz to a few hundred MHz       or       > > even 1GHz. If it will do period counting too, so much the better as it will       > > then very accurately measure frequencies lower than 100kHz.       >       > You would benefit from understanding how "reciprocal counters"       > and "statistical counters" work, in particular their differences       > from old-school frequency counters.       >              ** OTOH you would benefit a lot by removing your fat head from your arse hole.              >       > > You can use one to calibrate other instruments like audio and RF generators       > > or scopes. Nothing else substitutes for one.       >       > Modern (i.e last quarter century) signal sources use DDS and       > VCO/synthesiser techniques. The frequency defined by a crystal       > and hence is accurate by design, not measurement.       >       >              ** Shame about the other ones, the vast majority of low cost bench generators       are simple analogue oscillators that need calibration.                     > > Though I am mainly an audio tech, I use a 1GHz model to check the frequency       > > and general operation of radio mic and RC transmitters.       >       > A spectrum analyser would be of help to you, since it would       > enable you to see far more than just an average frequency.              ** Way more than needed for the job at hand and way beyond justifiable cost.                     > Think of modulation, intermodulation, spurs and harmonics.       >              ** Simple means exist to check AM and FM modulation using the matching       receivers or a radio scanner while spurious signals from a 20 to 50mW       transmitter are insignificant to the point of being unheard off in practice.              Arguing from half baked theory is your only forte - right ?                     >       > > My spare (40MHz) counter is permanently linked to my analogue audio       > > generator, for fairly obvious reasons.       >       > If you want a "very accurate" measurement of an audio frequency,       > you will need a reciprocal counter.       >              ** The term "period counter" means the same thing.              Try reading someone's post carefully before embarking an a campaign of       completely irrelevant criticism - fuckhead.              Cos you are about one tenth as smart as you imagine.                     ..... Phil              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca