home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.electronics.basics      Elementary questions about electronics      72,318 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 71,314 of 72,318   
   Phil Allison to Tom Gardner Fuckwit Asshole Pig   
   Re: Frequency counter   
   16 Jul 19 16:07:41   
   
   From: pallison49@gmail.com   
      
   Tom Gardner Fuckwit Asshole Pig wrote:   
      
   > >>   
   > >> Work out what you want to achieve, and only then work out how to achieve   
   > >> it. Frequency counters are nice for timenuts but nowadays different   
   > >> instruments are often better.   
   > >>   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > ** A standard frequency counter is an indispensable piece of workshop gear.   
   > >   
   > > By "standard" I mean one covering the range from 1Hz to a few hundred MHz   
   or   
   > > even 1GHz. If it will do period counting too, so much the better as it will   
   > > then very accurately measure frequencies lower than 100kHz.   
   >   
   > You would benefit from understanding how "reciprocal counters"   
   > and "statistical counters" work, in particular their differences   
   > from old-school frequency counters.   
   >   
      
   ** OTOH you would benefit a lot by removing your fat head from your arse hole.   
      
   >   
   > > You can use one to calibrate other instruments like audio and RF generators   
   > > or scopes. Nothing else substitutes for one.   
   >   
   > Modern (i.e last quarter century) signal sources use DDS and   
   > VCO/synthesiser techniques. The frequency defined by a crystal   
   > and hence is accurate by design, not measurement.   
   >   
   >   
      
   ** Shame about the other ones, the vast majority of low cost bench generators   
   are simple analogue oscillators that need calibration.   
      
      
   > > Though I am mainly an audio tech, I use a 1GHz model to check the frequency   
   > > and general operation of radio mic and RC transmitters.   
   >   
   > A spectrum analyser would be of help to you, since it would   
   > enable you to see far more than just an average frequency.   
      
   ** Way more than needed for the job at hand and way beyond justifiable cost.   
      
      
   > Think of modulation, intermodulation, spurs and harmonics.   
   >   
      
   ** Simple means exist to check AM and FM modulation using the matching   
   receivers or a radio scanner while spurious signals from a 20 to 50mW   
   transmitter are insignificant to the point of being unheard off in practice.   
      
   Arguing from half baked theory is your only forte - right ?   
      
      
   >   
   > > My spare (40MHz) counter is permanently linked to my analogue audio   
   > > generator, for fairly obvious reasons.   
   >   
   > If you want a "very accurate" measurement of an audio frequency,   
   > you will need a reciprocal counter.   
   >   
      
   ** The term "period counter" means the same thing.   
      
   Try reading someone's post carefully before embarking an a campaign of   
   completely irrelevant criticism - fuckhead.   
      
   Cos you are about one tenth as smart as you imagine.   
      
      
   .....  Phil   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca