Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 71,675 of 72,318    |
|    Phil Hobbs to Tom Del Rosso    |
|    Re: Flux density    |
|    24 May 20 09:11:47    |
      XPost: sci.electronics.design       From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net              On 2020-05-24 00:47, Tom Del Rosso wrote:       > Reviewing stuff I forgot during lockdown, this is one thing I never got.       >       > H is amp-turns/meter, and having distance in the denominator suggests       > that it is also a measure of flux density (but without the core       > influences). So why is B defined as flux density, as if that       > distinguishes it from H?       >       >       It's just a definition. In Gaussian units (rationalized CGS-ESU), B is       quoted in gauss and H in oersted, but there's no actual dimensional       difference, i.e. mu is dimensionless.              Cheers              Phil Hobbs              --       Dr Philip C D Hobbs       Principal Consultant       ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics       Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics       Briarcliff Manor NY 10510              http://electrooptical.net       http://hobbs-eo.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca