Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 71,677 of 72,318    |
|    Tom Del Rosso to Tim Williams    |
|    Re: Flux density    |
|    24 May 20 20:39:31    |
      XPost: sci.electronics.design       From: fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com              Tim Williams wrote:       > B is flux density: wrap a loop of wire around a given cross-sectional       > area, of uniform flux density B, and you get B*A flux in that loop       > (which if the flux is changing, you can do Faraday's law, etc.). Who       > knows what current flows in the wire.       >       > Conversely, put some current into a loop of a given perimeter, and       > you have some magnetic field intensity H within it (give or take       > geometry, of course). Who knows how much flux that took.       >       > In space, the ratio of these two happens to be mu_0. Or at the       > terminals of the loop, its inductance: H == V.s / A. For general       > materials, use mu = mu_0 * mu_r, and the effective cross sectional       > area A_e and effective path length l_e.              I think Phil understood best what I meant, but all the answers (except       Kevin Bacon) contributed something helpful. Thanks so much.              A few things.              Where do you measure l_e?              What is V_s?              And you seem to be relating inductance H to mu, but isn't that a whole       different H? Inductance doesn't depend on current for one thing.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca