home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.electronics.basics      Elementary questions about electronics      72,318 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 71,677 of 72,318   
   Tom Del Rosso to Tim Williams   
   Re: Flux density   
   24 May 20 20:39:31   
   
   XPost: sci.electronics.design   
   From: fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com   
      
   Tim Williams wrote:   
   > B is flux density: wrap a loop of wire around a given cross-sectional   
   > area, of uniform flux density B, and you get B*A flux in that loop   
   > (which if the flux is changing, you can do Faraday's law, etc.).  Who   
   > knows what current flows in the wire.   
   >   
   > Conversely, put some current into a loop of a given perimeter, and   
   > you have some magnetic field intensity H within it (give or take   
   > geometry, of course).  Who knows how much flux that took.   
   >   
   > In space, the ratio of these two happens to be mu_0.  Or at the   
   > terminals of the loop, its inductance: H == V.s / A.  For general   
   > materials, use mu = mu_0 * mu_r, and the effective cross sectional   
   > area A_e and effective path length l_e.   
      
   I think Phil understood best what I meant, but all the answers (except   
   Kevin Bacon) contributed something helpful.  Thanks so much.   
      
   A few things.   
      
   Where do you measure l_e?   
      
   What is V_s?   
      
   And you seem to be relating inductance H to mu, but isn't that a whole   
   different H?  Inductance doesn't depend on current for one thing.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca