Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 71,902 of 72,318    |
|    Phil Hobbs to Tom Del Rosso    |
|    Re: E field impedance    |
|    15 Oct 20 14:24:57    |
      From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net              On 2020-10-14 16:58, Tom Del Rosso wrote:       > As the story goes, the E field starts with high impedance and it goes       > down until it's equal to the H field impedance in the far field. It's       > just so counter-intuitive that impedance would go down as you get       > farther from the source. Is there a somewhat intuitive way to look at       > that?       >       > On another matter, I've asked before about the disagreement between some       > books with diagrams of E and M in phase and some books showing them 90       > degrees out of phase. Now I found one source that says they're in phase       > in the near and 90 degrees in the far.       >       >              For a propagating wave in a lossless medium, E and H are in phase. If       the medium is isotropic, they're also orthogonal. In the near field it       varies depending on the situation, e.g. between a waveguide horn and a       wire antenna.              The only wave impedance I know about is sqrt(E/H).              Cheers              Phil Hobbs              --       Dr Philip C D Hobbs       Principal Consultant       ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics       Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics       Briarcliff Manor NY 10510              http://electrooptical.net       http://hobbs-eo.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca