Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 71,903 of 72,318    |
|    Tom Del Rosso to Phil Hobbs    |
|    Re: E field impedance    |
|    17 Oct 20 15:15:18    |
      From: fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com              Phil Hobbs wrote:       > On 2020-10-14 16:58, Tom Del Rosso wrote:       >> As the story goes, the E field starts with high impedance and it goes       >> down until it's equal to the H field impedance in the far field. It's       >> just so counter-intuitive that impedance would go down as you get       >> farther from the source. Is there a somewhat intuitive way to look at       >> that?       >>       >> On another matter, I've asked before about the disagreement between       >> some books with diagrams of E and M in phase and some books showing       >> them 90 degrees out of phase. Now I found one source that says       >> they're in phase in the near and 90 degrees in the far.       >>       >>       >       > For a propagating wave in a lossless medium, E and H are in phase. If       > the medium is isotropic, they're also orthogonal. In the near field       > it varies depending on the situation, e.g. between a waveguide horn       > and a wire antenna.              Thank you.                     > The only wave impedance I know about is sqrt(E/H).              What does it even mean for a magnetic field to have impedance? Shouldn't       it be reluctance?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca