XPost: free.spam
From: always.look@message.header
No, thanks anyway...
--
Rich wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.PO
TED!not-for-mail
> From: Rich
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
> Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:59:53 -0000 (UTC)
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 35
> Message-ID:
> References:
> Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:59:53 -0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="
71d69244b44f2167a5474a852a92cea"; logging-data="1705"; mail-comp
aints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2F
dGVkX18WDlUwqnHhTSdJSoCqQnVy"
> User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/3.10.17 (x86_64))
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:LBNwrlosj8h+C/mmb8/JDn9V+kU=
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55501
>
> John Doe wrote:
>> Rich wrote:
>>
>>> John Doe wrote:
>>>> Rich wrote:
>>>>> John Doe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the
>>>>>> circuit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course the resistor must handle the current.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any problems with that?
>>>>>
>>>>> If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have
>>>>> a variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.
>>>>
>>>> If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?
>>>
>>> No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which
>>> the voltage changes.
>>
>> Then your answer should be "Yes", given the same amount of time.
>
> No, the correct answer is "no". The voltage variation can be
> substantial. Rate of change is a different measure than voltage
> magnitude.
>
>> Why are you fighting this?
>
> Note that I could ask you the same question. My answer is correct,
> yours is incorrect.
>
>
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
