XPost: free.spam   
   From: always.look@message.header   
      
   Bullshit...   
      
   --   
   Glenn Gundlach  wrote:   
      
   > X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4349:: with SMTP id q9mr5905486qvs.23.   
   612554086079;        Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:41:26 -0800 (PST)   
   > X-Received: by 2002:a4a:c602:: with SMTP id l2mr4658324ooq.5.1612554085805;   
   Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:41:25 -0800 (PST)   
   > Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!new   
   .uzoreto.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03   
   ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.hig   
   winds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.   
   highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews   
   google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail   
   > Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics   
   > Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:41:25 -0800 (PST)   
   > In-Reply-To:    
   > Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com   
   > Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.96.68.241;   
   posting-account=JX7V1wkAAAAeax67P9giUWdoKufQ8keT   
   > NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.96.68.241   
   > References:     
        
   > User-Agent: G2/1.0   
   > MIME-Version: 1.0   
   > Message-ID: <5dbc9fbb-777c-4858-9f31-91d20a48b662n@googlegroups.com>   
   > Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?   
   > From: Glenn Gundlach    
   > Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:41:26 +0000   
   > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"   
   > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable   
   > X-Received-Bytes: 2383   
   > Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55516   
   >   
   > On Monday, February 1, 2021 at 3:26:14 AM UTC-8, John Doe wrote:   
   >> Rich  wrote:   
   >> > John Doe wrote:   
   >> >> Rich wrote:   
   >> >>> John Doe wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >>>> I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit   
   > ?   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> Of course the resistor must handle the current.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> Any problems with that?   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a   
   >   
   >> >>> variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?   
   >> >   
   >> > No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the   
   >   
   >> > voltage changes.   
   >> Then your answer should be "Yes", given the same amount of time.   
   >>   
   >> Why are you fighting this?   
   >>   
   >> Do you think it makes you look smart?   
   >   
   > Mr. Doe, Rich explained it correctly. You are wrong and he is right. How   
   much Voltage are you trying to get rid of?   
   >   
   > G¶ý   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)