From: bill.sloman@ieee.org
On 12/11/2025 2:21 am, john larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 18:17:21 +1100, Bill Sloman
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/2025 6:45 am, john larkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 17:40:29 +1100, Bill Sloman
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/11/2025 5:16 am, john larkin wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 04:08:21 +1100, Bill Sloman
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/11/2025 2:24 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
>>>>>>> Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> You've chopped my text - which made it perfectly clear that I wasn't
>>>>>>>> going around telling people that they were fools - so that you could
>>>>>>>> post something gratuitously offensive.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought you considered gratuitously offensive posts were the normal
>>>>>>> way of replying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't go out of my way to be offensive, but I don't sugar-coat my
>>>>>> messages either. John Larkin expects to be flattered, and is offended
>>>>>> when he isn't, to the point where he thinks he is being insulted, but
>>>>>> this strikes me as an unusual attitude.
>>>>>
>>>>> You obsess over JL and DT. I'm in good company.
>>>>
>>>> You think that Donald Trump is good company? Jeffrey Epstein did too.
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein
>>>
>>> DT banned him from Mar-a-Lago after he messed with some of DT's young
>>> female employees.
>> That's what Donald Trump now claims
>>
>>> DT's taste in women trends towards the bigger end.
>>
>> Grabbing them by the pussy?
>
> Tasteless, but he did say "they let you."
>
> Sexual aggression is a common trait in politicians; it's part of the
> power pattern.
So that's what you see as "good company". The sexually predator isn't
any kind of good company.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
