From: jl@glen--canyon.com   
      
   On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:13:08 -0500, "Edward Rawde"   
    wrote:   
      
   >Due to a "Header too long" message while trying to reply to Bill Sloman's   
   post at 11:41 PM in "coil impedance".   
   >Here is my reply.   
   >   
   >"Bill Sloman"  wrote in message news:10f1   
   5p$17b8q$1@dont-email.me...   
   >> On 12/11/2025 1:49 am, Edward Rawde wrote:   
   >>> "Bill Sloman"  wrote in message news:1   
   evhdm$p0a1$2@dont-email.me...   
   >>>> On 11/11/2025 11:12 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:   
   >>>>> "Bill Sloman"  wrote in message news   
   10eunlu$hv9m$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>> On 11/11/2025 2:48 am, Edward Rawde wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "Bill Sloman"  wrote in message ne   
   s:10es5mv$3r8qk$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>> On 10/11/2025 4:01 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> "Bill Sloman"  wrote in message    
   ews:10erqko$3o5c0$6@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2025 3:29 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> "Bill Sloman"  wrote in message   
   news:10ermr8$3o5c0$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2025 2:57 am, Edward Rawde wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bill Sloman"  wrote in message   
   news:10epc7k$33b3h$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/11/2025 4:01 am, Edward Rawde wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bill Sloman"  wrote in message   
   news:10emnnb$2cnh3$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2025 4:49 am, Edward Rawde wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bill Sloman"  wrote in message   
   news:10elb3i$20r3i$3@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2025 3:31 am, Edward Rawde wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liz Tuddenham"  wrote   
   in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1rlfnmd.5t4y3yjlsancN%liz@poppyrecords.   
   nvalid.invalid...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Sloman  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2025 9:24 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Sloman  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2025 10:41 am, john larkin wrote:   
   >>   
   >>    
   >>   
   >>> If you believe that I ever mentioned tantalum bead capacitors anywhere   
   >>> else then you need to reference that post and the specific part of it or   
   shut up.   
   >>   
   >> I never said you did. The schematic just showed big capacitors, and in real   
   life they would have been tantalum bead parts.   
   >   
   >Excuse me while I fall about laughing.   
   >   
   >I could ask you to reference or post this schematic which showed big   
   capacitors (plural)   
   >but I'm not going to bother.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>    
   >>   
   >> --   
   >> Bill Sloman, Sydney   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
      
   Tantalums are prone to detonation, if handled badly. And they are   
   often handled badly.   
      
      
   John Larkin   
   Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center   
   Lunatic Fringe Electronics   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)