From: jl@glen--canyon.com   
      
   On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:46:45 +1100, Bill Sloman    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 12/11/2025 2:21 am, john larkin wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 18:17:21 +1100, Bill Sloman    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 11/11/2025 6:45 am, john larkin wrote:   
   >>>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 17:40:29 +1100, Bill Sloman    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 9/11/2025 5:16 am, john larkin wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 04:08:21 +1100, Bill Sloman    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 9/11/2025 2:24 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Bill Sloman  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>>>> You've chopped my text - which made it perfectly clear that I wasn't   
   >>>>>>>>> going around telling people that they were fools - so that you could   
   >>>>>>>>> post something gratuitously offensive.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I thought you considered gratuitously offensive posts were the normal   
   >>>>>>>> way of replying.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I don't go out of my way to be offensive, but I don't sugar-coat my   
   >>>>>>> messages either. John Larkin expects to be flattered, and is offended   
   >>>>>>> when he isn't, to the point where he thinks he is being insulted, but   
   >>>>>>> this strikes me as an unusual attitude.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You obsess over JL and DT. I'm in good company.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You think that Donald Trump is good company? Jeffrey Epstein did too.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein   
   >>>>   
   >>>> DT banned him from Mar-a-Lago after he messed with some of DT's young   
   >>>> female employees.   
   >>> That's what Donald Trump now claims   
   >>>   
   >>>> DT's taste in women trends towards the bigger end.   
   >>>   
   >>> Grabbing them by the pussy?   
   >>   
   >> Tasteless, but he did say "they let you."   
   >>   
   >> Sexual aggression is a common trait in politicians; it's part of the   
   >> power pattern.   
   >   
   >So that's what you see as "good company". The sexually predator isn't   
   >any kind of good company.   
      
   I never said that. I'm a one-woman guy; having more than one   
   girlfriend confuses me.   
      
   Some guys like having many lady friends; that seems to be pretty   
   common these days. But that's not predatory if the girls cooperate.   
      
   You may as well call the women predatory.   
      
      
   John Larkin   
   Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center   
   Lunatic Fringe Electronics   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)