Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.design    |    Electronic circuit design    |    143,102 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,371 of 143,102    |
|    Martin Brown to Don Y    |
|    Re: "Imaging" the sky    |
|    27 Nov 25 16:21:46    |
      From: '''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk              On 26/11/2025 21:56, Don Y wrote:        > On 11/26/2025 2:40 AM, Martin Brown wrote:               > Stuff left outdoors, here, takes a real beating. We have over 300       "sunny"        > days, annually (and perhaps only a dozen truly "overcast" days; the rest        > being a mixture). We have ~60 days above 100F -- though have had as        > any as 99 in the years I've been here.       Here it is rain and high humidity that kill them by corrosion.        >> Edwards Optics might have something suitable but they are a bit pricey.        >        > "Edwards" or "Edmunds"? The latter have a design center, here, in town.       Edmund. My typo or spell checker altered it for me.        > We have REALLY dark skies, here. It is possible to watch meteor showers,        > satellite passages, etc. with the naked eye. (We do so for most of the        > bigger meteor showers) The biggest offender is light leaking from the        > windows in your own home!       I remember observing at Zion canyon once and a young deer stumbled into       me in the dark. The mountain outline was still visibly darker than the       sky but the ribbon of the milkyway was incredible. I live in a darker       rural part of the UK where it is visible but never like that.              We do see meteor showers clearly at least when the clouds permit...        > As it is such an arid climate, cloud cover is relatively rare (though we        > got screwed last week as we had one of our infrequent storms coincident        > with the Leonids). The huge expanses of "empty" (desert) land also        > help maintain that level of darkness.       There is a reason why optical observatories like high desert locations.        > My intent is just to integrate "light" for some period at some       direction at        > some time. And, correlate this with other observations "this date, last        > year",        > "yesterday", etc. to get a feel for what the skies look like.       One thing that may be useful to know is that yesterday 4 minutes later       than clock time now the sky should look identical to today (AOTBE).       Strictly 3m 56s. Sidereal day is 3m 56s shorter than mean solar time.        > Much like a regular Joe would do: "It's cloudy tonight. No need to        > protect        > the cold sensitive plants as it likely won't get very cold." His       knowledge        > of the past/future isn't anywhere near as specific as that of a machine        > -- yet,        > serves him well (enough).       For that you probably want windspeed and a simple skyward and ground       facing thermocouple pair. Rapid cooling of the skyward one means real       risk of frost.              --       Martin Brown              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca