Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.design    |    Electronic circuit design    |    143,326 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,390 of 143,326    |
|    Martin Brown to Don Y    |
|    Re: "Imaging" the sky    |
|    29 Nov 25 15:28:58    |
      From: '''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk              On 28/11/2025 23:35, Don Y wrote:       >>> Do I need that much more "resolution" than simply imaging (sky and       >>> soil) with an Ir camera?       >>       >> The idea is to have a two pixel imaging system consisting of a pair of       >> thermometers with low thermal inertia one facing upwards shielded from       >> the ground and another that is ground facing and shielded from the sky.       >       > The thinking being that "change" is quick and sudden?              It is essentially a fairly pure measurement of radiative heat loss to       the sky which will under most circumstances be a very good guide.              Once you have a few temperature curves for typical conditions that's       good enough. High cirrus can make quite a difference to thermal losses       to the sky although nothing like as much thick low cloud does.       >       >> The temperature difference and its rate of change gives you the extent       >> to which the situation is likely to allow a frost and/of fog to form.       >>       >> You also need windspeed and relative humidity. This is probably the       >> simplest kit configuration to predict risk of frost of fog.       >>       >> Dew point was always very important to astronomers and highway traffic       >> monitors so you can get purpose built kit for this sort of thing.       >       > We used to used chilled mirror sensors for dewpoint. But, were       > concerned about       > *actual* dewpoints as we were regulating a thermodynamic process.              We were mainly concerned with not getting condensation onto the optics       or mast head amplifier depending on the type of receiver/sensor.              > I think I can cut corners, here, as I am looking for "correlations" and not       > "numerics":       >       > "When I see this set of conditions, the following has proven to be true..."              I think what we have proposed might be OK for that and fairly robust       minimal & cheap too.              --       Martin Brown              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca