Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.design    |    Electronic circuit design    |    143,326 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,488 of 143,326    |
|    Don Y to Glen Walpert    |
|    Re: Potting compound    |
|    03 Dec 25 14:12:04    |
      From: blockedofcourse@foo.invalid              On 12/3/2025 5:05 AM, Glen Walpert wrote:              > You can get nearly water clear epoxy. If you have ever been to a bar or       > restaurant with a thick clear coating on tables or bar, often with stuff       > embedded, that is epoxy. You cannot however get any clear epoxy with       > decent UV resistance - clear epoxy coated tables used outdoors must be       > coated with a UV blocking polyurethane in order to survive, and they need       > to be recoated every 3 to 5 years.              But, are they recoated because the abrasion of daily use wears the       coating off? Or, does the exposure to sunlight do that?              > There is no clear casting material       > available with 20 year life expectancy when exposed to direct sunlight,              As I mentioned to Martin, upthread, only some of my devices are exposed       to sunlight. ALL (or, almost all) are exposed to the temperature extremes       I cited.              But, I would hate to have to stock a "UV tolerant" and "UV intolerant"       version of each module. There would be no way I could ensure a third-party       installer would use the correct version in a particular application. So,       easier to just have them all the same (which is what my "glass inserts"       approach does).              I can (electronically) inventory every device and have the UV/no-UV devices       report different part numbers. But, have to rely on someone on-site (i.e.,       the installer) to accurately describe where each is sited. And, hope their       descriptions include the information I would need to detect a "misapplication".              [If you look at the work of many tradesmen, it is often "barely competent".       And, if the consequences don't manifest for years, they'll be long gone.]              [[A reputable electric company (electrician) in town installed a pair       of coach lights on the neighbors back porch. When I visited the neighbor,       I had to list the things that were wrong with the installation:       - ROMEX stapled to timbers (no EMT)       - lights located at eye level       - no boxes to support the fixtures, just notches snipped out of their        bases to allow the cable to enter/exit the fixture while the fixtures        were secured to the timbers with wood screws       - no GFCI on the circuit (outdoor, eye level)       The owner of the company paid a visit and was embarassed by the quality of       workmanship. What would the outcome have been had I not commented on it?       Maybe when the house eventuall was resold and a home inspection flagged       the work??]]              > for that you need to use the method used by solar panel manufacturers -       > laminate to the back of a piece of tempered glass, which will provide a       > weather resistant UV blocking outer layer for the assembly. Some       > flexibility of potting material is required to accommodate differential       > thermal expansion, silicone or polyurethane are more likely to work than       > epoxy. Solar panel manufacturers did a lot of research to find the best       > compound, but I forget what it was, you could no doubt find out with a bit       > of searching.              Thanks!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca