From: user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Bill Sloman  posted:   
      
   > On 5/12/2025 12:31 am, E.Laureti wrote:   
   > >   
   > > john larkin  posted:   
   > >   
   > >> On Tue, 02 Dec 2025 16:09:58 GMT, E.Laureti   
   > >>  wrote:   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >   
   > > Unfortunately, the PNN conflicts with the failed history of so-called   
   reactionless devices.   
   > >   
   > > I know countless non-PNN space drives that all suffer from the misfortune   
   > > of not working becausethey are based on completely wrong physical   
   assumptions.   
   > > The bulk of reactionless believers refers   
   > > to those who think they can bypass Newton using Newtonian mechanics :-)...   
   > > like the Dean Drive... and/or gyroscopic effects :-)   
   > >   
   > > Then came those with pseudo-physical principles that were never proven.   
   > > Basically metaphysical delusions   
   > > in which the metaphysical delusion applied to a so-called reactionless   
   > >   object would supposedly prove the delusion itself.   
   > >   
   > > I am talking about Mach's principle, the physicist and philosopher   
   > > (see Wikipedia):   
   > > Mach's principle is a hypothesis formulated by the physicist and   
   philosopher   
   > >   Ernst Mach in 1893, which states:   
   > >   
   > > The inertia of any system is the result of the interaction of the system   
   > >   itself with the   
   > > rest of the universe. In other words, every particle present in the cosmos   
   has an influence on every other particle.   
   > >   
   > > Something unfortunately NEVER experimentally tested. Mach's principle is   
   > >   essentially a philosophical hallucination   
   > >   that became physics because the inventor, after philosophy, turned to   
   physics. :-)   
   >   
   > Worse than that, it's untestable, because we haven't got a separate   
   > universe in which to carry out any kind of comparison,   
      
   cut   
      
      
   You’re even telling me and other  in this NG that at the Italian patent   
   office and the European one they understand nothing.   
      
   Patent:   
   WO2022264177 - ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT   
   MOVEMENT WITHOUT THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS   
   https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2022264177   
      
   And even those who see our experimental tests understand nothing.   
   https://player.vimeo.com/video/476068648   
      
   Nor why you can’t replicate a basic verification of pendulum test, and why   
   understand absolutely nothing.... Translate from   
   http://www.asps.it/VenditaF432BA.pdf   
      
   Now you start to to make me understand clearly why even those at the European   
   patent office   
   https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2022264177   
    are idiots  😊   
   There are various pages and lines. Tell me what is the first line  you don’t   
   understand!  I bet you will evade it! 😊   
      
   I add that you don’t even understand this fact: 20 years ago with very   
   little PNN push, it was a scam done to others as well.   
   http://www.asps.it/qct05_ENG.mp4   
      
   Come see our scales, or better yet bring yours... and we will witness the   
   scale conspiracy of kg of PNN push 😊   
      
   Dr. E.Laureti    from Roma   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)