Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.design    |    Electronic circuit design    |    143,102 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,611 of 143,102    |
|    John R Walliker to Don Y    |
|    Re: Carbon monoxide sensor    |
|    11 Dec 25 20:19:55    |
      From: jrwalliker@gmail.com              On 11/12/2025 20:03, Don Y wrote:       > On 12/11/2025 6:37 AM, John R Walliker wrote:       >>> What's it do at 1 cm? Or, do we just pretend there is an       >>> absence of effect at distances closer than 30 cm? Why       >>> 30 and not 10? Or, 500?       >>       >> In the case of the horn system you mentioned there is a       >> public address mode. For that to work without gross       >> distortion there is a fundamental limit of about 191dBspl       >> when the negative peaks of a sine wave go to zero pressure.       >> This applies even inside the horn.       >> The system however has 18 horns, so at short distances       >> it becomes impossible to come up with a meaningful       >> measurement. Where do you measure from?       >       > Do you think THEORY just stops working without measurements?       >       >>> My point is, that is a "respectible" manufacturer targeting       >>> a "knowledgeable" community. If they had chosen to       >>> extend their data to shorter distances, they aren't       >>> "making stuff up".       >>>       >>> Consumer markets operate under entirely different assumptions.       >>>       >>> What makes one "aspirin" more expensive than another?       >>>       >>> If I tell you that this screwdriver is hardened to Rc 65,       >>> would you purchase it over another hardened to Rc 64? 66?       >>>       >>> Why do you purchase one brand of "batteries" over another?       >>> Is there any reliable data on their capacities? Have you       >>> done any specific research?       >>       >> I avoid Duracell because I have found that they leak more often       >> than other brands that I have tried. I do sometimes test the       >> capacities of batteries, especially if I am about to buy a large       >> number.       >       > Do you think people keep track of that *quantitatively*?       >       > Do you think they keep track of how often the blade on a particular       > brand of screwdriver deforms? Or, the tip sheared off? Or, the       > application in which said deformations take place (to make "fair"       > comparisons)?       >       > Or, if the aspirins they purchased "last time" came with any       > digestive problems? If the weight of the "actives" inside each       > tablet was consistent? Their dissolution times? Yet, the price       > varies by about a FACTOR of *4*!       >       > You get a "feel" for a product and make recommendations to others       > based on that "feel". And, use advertised information to decide       > when to move up or down that relative scale based on whether       > you want something "more" or "less".       >       >>> Ivory soap claims to be "99.44% pure" -- why aren't other       >>> soap manufacturers marketing "99.45% pure" products?       >>       >> Sometimes there are regulatory limits to the claims that can       >> be made.       >       > In most cases, there aren't. There isn't a 99.45% product because       > Ivory already cornered that "purity" appeal. What does "purity"       > in a bar of soap mean? Does it make you cleaner? Less dermatological       > reactions? What does the scent of Irish Spring have to do with       > cleanliness? Does the abrasiveness of Lava make a real difference?       >       > I buy LED light bulbs. They all CLAIM to have lifespans of 50,000+       > hours. Yet, I've replaced most of them, already, even under the       > "recommended operating conditions". Should I look for another       > product that claims 100,000+ hours?       >       > Engineers get used to absolutes. It's psychologically comforting       > to be able to lean on some "hard numbers" to bolster your claims.       > Consumers put little faith in those. *Designing* for that market       > is entirely different than for a regulated market or one where       > the customer expects metrics to apply. There, you don't want the       > customer to remember any negative aspects of your product that       > will discourage him from a repeat purchase.       >       > A "300 dB horn" just has to SOUND loud. REALLY loud.       >              How can companies compete fairly when their claims are so       obviously made up?       Why should I believe one impossible claim is better or worse than       another impossible claim?       John              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca