From: bill.sloman@ieee.org
On 13/12/2025 8:17 am, john larkin wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 13:49:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:17:33 -0800, john larkin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:57:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:54:21 -0500, ehsjr wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For those interested in the subject:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://retractionwatch.com/2025/12/03/authors-retract-nat
re-paper-projecting-high-costs-of-climate-change/
>>>>>
>>>>> Ed
>>>>
>>>> "Climate Change" is all BS anyway. Nothing to do with "carbon" in any
>>>> form.
>>>
>>> Carbon is great. Plants love it.
>>>
>>> Many tasty things include carbon.
>>
>> Well, quite. Only the terminally obtuse like Bill Sloman would argue
>> with that.
>
> The increase in plant yield, from more CO2 and maybe a bit of warming,
> will benefit billions of poor people far beyond any hypothetical/hysterical
harm.
It will benefit weeds more than the crops we carefully selected to grow
well in the climate we had from the end of the last ice age to the start
of the industrial revolution.
> Just the neurotic climate change fear and economic-political stupidity
> is doing far more damage than a little warming.
The political-economic stupidity is being exhibited by the fossil fuel
industry, who think that by lying they can deal with the progressively
increasing damage being done to the planet and the economy by rising
global CO2 levels and the consequent global warming (which isn't small).
There's nothing neurotic about worrying about that. Ignoring it is
psychopathic - and in the fossil fuel industry it's criminal
irresponsibility.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
