From: jl@glen--canyon.com   
      
   On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 15:34:14 +1100, Bill Sloman    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 13/12/2025 1:21 pm, john larkin wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 22:34:50 +0000, Cursitor Doom    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 13:17:46 -0800, john larkin    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 13:49:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:17:33 -0800, john larkin    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:57:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:54:21 -0500, ehsjr  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> For those interested in the subject:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> https://retractionwatch.com/2025/12/03/authors-retract-   
   ature-paper-projecting-high-costs-of-climate-change/   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Ed   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Climate Change" is all BS anyway. Nothing to do with "carbon" in any   
   >>>>>>> form.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Carbon is great. Plants love it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Many tasty things include carbon.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Well, quite. Only the terminally obtuse like Bill Sloman would argue   
   >>>>> with that.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The increase in plant yield, from more CO2 and maybe a bit of warming,   
   >>>> will benefit billions of poor people far beyond any   
   >>>> hypothetical/hysterical harm.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Just the neurotic climate change fear and economic-political stupidity   
   >>>> is doing far more damage than a little warming.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Indeed. There are so many young people who have actually become   
   >>> mentally unhinged as a result of buying into this giant con job. The   
   >>> perps behind it have a *lot* to answer for and I sincerely hope they   
   >>> see the inside of a jail cell one day.   
   >>   
   >> Many people don't want to bring kids into this horrible polluted   
   >> doomed world. Darwin effect will prevail.   
   >   
   >If your crops stop yielding as well as they used to because they are   
   >being exposed to higher temperatures than they were bred to deal with,   
   >there won't be a lot of reproduction. People with a better grasp of   
   >what's actually going on will have more kids, but it may not happen fast   
   >enough to get the lying fossil carbon companies lynched,   
      
   This being usenet, making sense is optional.   
      
      
   John Larkin   
   Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center   
   Lunatic Fringe Electronics   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)