From: bill.sloman@ieee.org   
      
   On 15/12/2025 11:35 am, john larkin wrote:   
   > On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 15:34:14 +1100, Bill Sloman    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 13/12/2025 1:21 pm, john larkin wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 22:34:50 +0000, Cursitor Doom    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 13:17:46 -0800, john larkin    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 13:49:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:17:33 -0800, john larkin    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:57:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:54:21 -0500, ehsjr  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> For those interested in the subject:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> https://retractionwatch.com/2025/12/03/authors-retract   
   nature-paper-projecting-high-costs-of-climate-change/   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Ed   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Climate Change" is all BS anyway. Nothing to do with "carbon" in any   
   >>>>>>>> form.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Carbon is great. Plants love it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Many tasty things include carbon.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Well, quite. Only the terminally obtuse like Bill Sloman would argue   
   >>>>>> with that.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The increase in plant yield, from more CO2 and maybe a bit of warming,   
   >>>>> will benefit billions of poor people far beyond any   
   >>>>> hypothetical/hysterical harm.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Just the neurotic climate change fear and economic-political stupidity   
   >>>>> is doing far more damage than a little warming.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Indeed. There are so many young people who have actually become   
   >>>> mentally unhinged as a result of buying into this giant con job. The   
   >>>> perps behind it have a *lot* to answer for and I sincerely hope they   
   >>>> see the inside of a jail cell one day.   
   >>>   
   >>> Many people don't want to bring kids into this horrible polluted   
   >>> doomed world. Darwin effect will prevail.   
   >>   
   >> If your crops stop yielding as well as they used to because they are   
   >> being exposed to higher temperatures than they were bred to deal with,   
   >> there won't be a lot of reproduction. People with a better grasp of   
   >> what's actually going on will have more kids, but it may not happen fast   
   >> enough to get the lying fossil carbon companies lynched,   
   >   
   > This being usenet, making sense is optional.   
      
   Which you and Cursitor Doom exploit to the hilt, though you may not   
   realise it. Climate change denial propaganda really is a giant con job,   
   but you two don't seem to have noticed.   
      
   --   
   Bill Sloman, Sydney   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)