From: bill.sloman@ieee.org
On 16/12/2025 6:28 am, john larkin wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:52:13 +1100, Bill Sloman
> wrote:
>
>> On 15/12/2025 11:35 am, john larkin wrote:
>>> On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 15:34:14 +1100, Bill Sloman
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 13/12/2025 1:21 pm, john larkin wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 22:34:50 +0000, Cursitor Doom
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 13:17:46 -0800, john larkin
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 13:49:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:17:33 -0800, john larkin
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:57:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:54:21 -0500, ehsjr wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For those interested in the subject:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://retractionwatch.com/2025/12/03/authors-retra
t-nature-paper-projecting-high-costs-of-climate-change/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Climate Change" is all BS anyway. Nothing to do with "carbon" in
any
>>>>>>>>>> form.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Carbon is great. Plants love it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Many tasty things include carbon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, quite. Only the terminally obtuse like Bill Sloman would argue
>>>>>>>> with that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The increase in plant yield, from more CO2 and maybe a bit of warming,
>>>>>>> will benefit billions of poor people far beyond any
>>>>>>> hypothetical/hysterical harm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just the neurotic climate change fear and economic-political stupidity
>>>>>>> is doing far more damage than a little warming.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed. There are so many young people who have actually become
>>>>>> mentally unhinged as a result of buying into this giant con job. The
>>>>>> perps behind it have a *lot* to answer for and I sincerely hope they
>>>>>> see the inside of a jail cell one day.
>>>>>
>>>>> Many people don't want to bring kids into this horrible polluted
>>>>> doomed world. Darwin effect will prevail.
>>>>
>>>> If your crops stop yielding as well as they used to because they are
>>>> being exposed to higher temperatures than they were bred to deal with,
>>>> there won't be a lot of reproduction. People with a better grasp of
>>>> what's actually going on will have more kids, but it may not happen fast
>>>> enough to get the lying fossil carbon companies lynched,
>>>
>>> This being usenet, making sense is optional.
>>
>> Which you and Cursitor Doom exploit to the hilt, though you may not
>> realise it. Climate change denial propaganda really is a giant con job,
>> but you two don't seem to have noticed.
>
> Be as afraid as you like.
Why should I be afraid? Renewable energy got cheaper than energy
generated by burning fossil carbon about fifteen years ago, and the
process of switching our civilisation to relying on renewable energy is
well under way. Clowns like Trump are slowing down the changeover, and
the fossil carbon extraction business is fighting a rear-guard action
with lots of propaganda aimed at gullible twits like you, but the
economics are obvious enough to make it a futile exercise.
> And save as much fossil fuel as you can. That leaves more for us.
Why do you want to pay more for your power?
In any event it wouldn't be a wise move. In about 60,000 years we are
due for another ice age, and saving a strategic reserve of fossil carbon
so that we can use it stop it happening would be a sensible precaution,
not that you and Cursitor Doom have got enough sense to realise this.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
