From: user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> posted:   
      
   > On 02/01/2026 06:32, E.Laureti wrote:   
   > >   
   > > Bill Sloman  posted:   
   > >   
   > >> On 1/01/2026 8:54 pm, E.Laureti wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Bill Sloman  posted:   
   > >>>   
   >   
   > >>>> In fact it looks terrifying like earlier schemes that turned out to be   
   > >>>> scams.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> https://propulsion-revolution.com/en/pitchdeck   
   > >>   
   > >> Demonstrating that you are incompetent experimentalists isn't  a great   
   > >> way to attract investors/   
   >   
   > Several LNER proponents seemed to have been able to do it.   
   > One even took DOD for a ride :(   
   >   
   > > My prototypes work despite me being incompetent, while you competent people   
   > >   only have chatter   
   >   
   > They only work for some very relaxed definition of "work".   
   >   
   > You were consuming 250W for minutes and generated at most 2 gram force   
   > if we are to believe your graph and that was using an apparatus that is   
   > of unstated weight and a lot of energy.   
   >   
   > One thing about spacecraft is that they have to carry all their energy   
   > source with them. How will your magic carpet be powered?   
   >   
      
   Doing nothing of PNN experiment, you try to understand what i say   
    by newtonian physics.   
   Conclusion : PNN is absurd for  you  :-)   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)