Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.design    |    Electronic circuit design    |    143,102 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 142,002 of 143,102    |
|    Bill Sloman to TTman    |
|    Re: Digital LCD watch accuracy tester    |
|    08 Jan 26 03:39:27    |
      From: bill.sloman@ieee.org              On 8/01/2026 2:41 am, TTman wrote:       > Bac in the early 80s, I nade a lot of money selling 'better than normal       > accuracy' digital watches. A colleague designed and made an accuracy       > tester that showed +/- 20 seconds/month. The source accuracy was from       > MSF Rugby RF transmitter ( 1 pulse/second?). The detector ( I think) was       > some form of piezo... it was about 2mm diameter glued into a BNC housing       > ( for simplicity). It worked by touching the piezo probe onto the back       > of the watch ( with the back off) and I was able to adjust the trim cap       > to get close to a few seconds per month ( ignore ambient/body temp)       > This probe went into the box via a cable, was amplified and somehow       > comaped to the source and converted into secs/month.       > Can anyone figure out how this probe was constructed?       > Reason- I want to build another one with a 10Mhz reference Xtal etc.       > any suggestions welcomed.              Don't bother. 10MHz reference crystal aren't all that accurate. Get a       rubidium stabilised source if you can't pull a proper reference out of       the ether. Global positioning system reference frequencies are lot more       accurate than any 10MHz reference crystal, and there are other broadcast       frequencies which are almost as good.              The standard watch crystal is a 32,768kHz piezo fork, and if you put one       close to the metalwork around an active crystal in watch it would       presumably get mechanically excited by the watch crystal, and you should       be able detect an electrical signal on it's leads that would track       frequency being generated inside the watch.              The sensing crystal is unlikely to be resonant at exactly the same       frequency inside the watch so there would be a little phase lead or lag       between them, but it would be stable.              I've never seen it done, but it ought to work.              --       Bill Sloman, Sydney              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca