Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.design    |    Electronic circuit design    |    143,326 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 142,126 of 143,326    |
|    Don Y to Don Y    |
|    Re: microplastics    |
|    16 Jan 26 17:13:35    |
      From: blockedofcourse@foo.invalid              On 1/16/2026 5:06 PM, Don Y wrote:       > On 1/14/2026 10:37 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:       >       >> Paper bags, cardboard containers and wooden items are far more       >> environmentally friendly because we can grow more of them and they can       >> be burnt for fuel when we have finished with them without damaging the       >> environment as much as plastics would. They also have the advantage of       >> using up all those trees the campaigners urge us to plant, so reducing       >> the risk of forest fires.              There has been a move towards reusable "sacks" (often made of recycled       plastics -- also often "branded") to replace paper and plastic bags.              Sadly, most folks don't realize that the sacks just accumulate dirt,       grime, "germs", etc. so do themselves a DISservice by using them.              Warehouse stores usually pile their discardable cartons/boxes near       the check-out area so customers can use those to transport their       purchases home. Considerably more "material" than a paper bag       but easily recyclable (if you are careful to select based on       convenient physical size -- bigger is usually NOT better!)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca