From: thanks-to@Taf.com   
      
   Jan Panteltje schreef:   
   |----------------------------------------------------------------------|   
   |"[. . .] but go for dark energy and dark matter theory if you want..."|   
   |----------------------------------------------------------------------|   
      
   I am a professional physicist under a supervisrix who professes to   
   work on dark matter, and persons who do not bother to report correctly   
   profess that I be dedicated to dark matter.   
      
   Dark-matter professionals are dishonest and evil.   
      
   "This was my first attempt to express in the scientific literature my   
   concerns for the viability of the dark matter paradigm, and my   
   puzzlement that the only theory to get any genuine predictions right   
   was MOND. It was the hardest admission in my career that this could be   
   even a remote possibility. Nevertheless, intellectual honesty demanded   
   that I report it. To fail to do so would be an act of reality denial   
   antithetical to the foundational principles of science."   
   says   
   HTTPS://TritonStation.com/2020/12/31/25-years-a-heretic/   
      
   "That’s a painful process, and there is an urge in human nature to   
   deny such things, to pretend they never happened, or to assert that   
   what was wrong was right all along."   
   says   
   HTTPS://TritonStation.com/2021/04/12/divergence/   
      
   "It often happens that data are ambiguous and open to multiple   
   interpretations. The evidence for dark matter is an obvious example. I   
   frequently hear permutations on the statement   
      
   | We know dark matter exists; we just need to find it.   
      
   This is said in all earnestness by serious scientists who clearly   
   believe what they say. They mean it. Unfortunately, meaning something   
   in all seriousness, indeed, believing it with the intensity of   
   religious fervor, does not guarantee that it is so.   
      
   The way the statement above is phrased is a dangerous half-truth."   
   says   
   HTTPS://TritonStation.com/2021/04/16/bias-all-the-way-down/   
      
   "Kuhn noted that as paradigms reach their breaking point, there is a   
   divergence of opinions between scientists about what the important   
   evidence is, or what even counts as evidence. This has come to pass in   
   the debate over whether dark matter or modified gravity is a better   
   interpretation of the acceleration discrepancy problem."   
   says   
   HTTPS://TritonStation.com/2023/01/13/what-we-have-here-is-a-fail   
   re-to-communicate/   
      
   (S. HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/ fuer Kontaktdaten!)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)