home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.electronics.design      Electronic circuit design      143,102 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 142,269 of 143,102   
   Phil Hobbs to john larkin   
   Re: Velocity factor of co-ax (1/2)   
   24 Jan 26 19:41:56   
   
   From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net   
      
   john larkin  wrote:   
   > On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 18:50:17 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> john larkin  wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 20:21:42 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid   
   >>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> john larkin  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 19:08:50 +0000, Cursitor Doom    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 13:59:18 +0100, Jeroen Belleman   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 1/23/26 12:34, Liz Tuddenham wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> john larkin  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:38:41 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid   
   >>>>>>>>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> john larkin  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:29:10 +0000, liz@poppyrecords   
   invalid.invalid   
   >>>>>>>>>>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> What physical properties determine the velocity factor of co-ax?    
   Most   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> of the amateur radio books give around 60% as the velocity factor   
   for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 'common' types of 50-ohm co-ax.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> V = c/(sqrt(Er))   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Solid polyethylene has Er around 2.3.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Foamed stuff is lower.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Polyethylene is awful. It melts when you solder it. Foamed is   
   worse.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Solid polyethylene isn't too bad but foamed has a nasty habit of   
   moving   
   >>>>>>>>>> under the influence of its own 'memory'.  You solder the end of a   
   >>>>>>>>>> slightly bent centre conductor and, as the heat travels down it, the   
   >>>>>>>>>> foam springs back to the straight position, leaving you with a slot   
   in   
   >>>>>>>>>> the foam and a bare centre conductor shorted to the screen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Your VNA measurement may be suspect.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> That was why I asked about it here, I suspected the measurement.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> However... my method of finding the first reactance swing in the   
   >>>>>>>>>> reflection from an open circuit should give me a measurement of the   
   >>>>>>>>>> electrical length of the cable that is independent of the   
   terminating   
   >>>>>>>>>> impedances, calibration etc   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> The cable was physically 6.39 metres long and the first 'resistive'   
   >>>>>>>>>> impedance point was at exactly 15.000 Mc/s.  (That's another reason   
   I   
   >>>>>>>>>> was suspicious, it really was spot-on 15.000 Mc/s, give or take   
   >>>>>>>>>> nothing.)   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Looking for the max resistance may not be ideal.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Perhaps I didn't explain that very clearly.  It wasn't the point of   
   >>>>>>>> maximum resistance, it was the point where the capacitive reactance   
   >>>>>>>> swung through zero to become an inductive reactance; it was quite   
   >>>>>>>> sharply defined.  At that point the impedance was purely resistive but   
   >>>>>>>> it was the reactance that I was measuring, not the resistance.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> If you jack up the frequency and get multiple wavelengths in the   
   >>>>>>>>> cable, resolution will improve.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> True, but the electrical errors in measurement may increase too.  An   
   >>>>>>>> accuarcy of around 1% would be good enough for the present purposes -   
   >>>>>>>> after all, where exactly is the 'end' of a piece of co-ax that is   
   >>>>>>>> splayed out for connection to something else?  I also wouldn't expect   
   a   
   >>>>>>>> length of cheap co-ax to be particularly homogenous.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> 15.000 MHz seems suspicious.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Yes, that worried me.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I don't have a VNA. I use TDR to measure time delays.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> My VNA will also function as a TDR and I have a telephone-testing TDR   
   >>>>>>>> for longer lines.  If all else fails, a square-wave signal generator   
   and   
   >>>>>>>> an oscilloscope will work too.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Having used both VNAs and TDRs for cable length measurements, I've   
   >>>>>>> always found the VNA measurements much superior to those of a   
   >>>>>>> TDR. My HP8753 would resolve 1 degree @ 1GHz with ease. That   
   >>>>>>> corresponds to a little under 3ps. TDRs are much too noisy to   
   >>>>>>> do that.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Snap! Got the same one here, Jeroen. I've expanded mine to 6Ghz and am   
   >>>>>> contemplating the colour LCD conversion for it. Have you done this   
   >>>>>> with yours? My screen was getting pretty dim!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I've got a picture of a TDR and a VNA-derived measurement of the   
   >>>>>>> same setup here. Note how much cleaner is the trace from the   
   >>>>>>> VNA. You can't beat a VNA for S/N.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I made these measurements in the context of constructing a wide   
   >>>>>>> band beam transformer for the Proton Synchrotron at CERN.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Jeroen Belleman   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There are lots of very cheap VNAs around now.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Do any come with the software to transform TDRs?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Mine does.   
   >>>   
   >>> I think sine waves are boring - they just go around in circles - but   
   >>> we may be doing some RF switch modules and I guess people will expect   
   >>> some sort of S-parameter things. Or at least a spec of some Sxx at   
   >>> some max frequency, which will be 3 GHz in our case.   
   >>>   
   >>> I guess we can buy a cheap Amazon VNA and measure a couple of points.   
   >>> We could check its calibration with a couple of hanks of hardline or   
   >>> something.   
   >>>   
   >>> Sounds like an intern project.   
   >>>   
   >>> Can anyone suggest a suitable small inexpensive VNA? We might use it   
   >>> 10 times in its lifetime.   
   >>>   
   >>> The generic Amazons are about $150 for 3 GHz and twice that for 6.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Didn’t you folks get a NanoVNA a year or so back?   
   >   
   > I can't recall. Maybe one of my guys did.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> You want the genuine one, not the fleabay or jungle ones.   
   >>   
   >> https://www.tindie.com/products/hcxqsgroup/nanovna-v2-plus4/   
   >>   
   >> Cheers   
   >>   
   >> Phil Hobbs   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >   
   > We should probably go to 6 GHz, especially since these things are so   
   > cheap.   
   >   
      
   I’d probably be spending a few bucks on a calibration kit, then.  Cheap,   
   uncalibrated VNAs can produce lots of reasonable-looking wrong answers.   
      
   Cheers   
      
   Phil Hobbs   
      
      
   --   
   Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /   
   Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca