home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.electronics.design      Electronic circuit design      143,326 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 142,279 of 143,326   
   Bill Sloman to john larkin   
   Re: mounting a pot core   
   27 Jan 26 03:36:36   
   
   From: bill.sloman@ieee.org   
      
   On 27/01/2026 2:53 am, john larkin wrote:   
   > On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 22:44:02 -0500, legg  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 08:08:48 -0800, john larkin    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 08:51:24 -0500, legg  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 19:25:35 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid   
   >>>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>    
   >>>> In applications where power levels are important, pot core orientation   
   >>>> will affect 'N' in the flux density concentration, and produce early   
   >>>> saturation at the location where minimum x-sectional area occurs.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> RL   
   >>>   
   >>> That should have a small effect on my pulser. Ill try it.   
   >>>   
   >>> I got a 2% change in inductance when I rotated the core halves.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> John Larkin   
   >>> Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center   
   >>> Lunatic Fringe Electronics   
   >>   
   >> 2% FREE x-sectional area, and an indication that the previous   
   >> misalignment doesn't dominate minimum value.   
   >>   
   >> Mind you, you can get a similar change just by forcing out   
   >> the fluff and detritus present at the contacting surfaces.   
   >> That might be what you're actually seeing, even if the core   
   >> is gapped.   
   >>   
   >> In pot cores, minimum x-section usually occurs where the centre   
   >> core meets the top and bottom plates. In parts shapes designed   
   >> for power applications, this is usually corrected.   
   >>   
   >> This core rotation can be used as a tolerance trim, where   
   >> needed, but anything like that before impregnation is probably   
   >> just biting fart bubbles.   
   >   
   > Impregnation?   
      
   Some people like to lock the windings and the leads in place with a   
   heavy layer of encapsulant. This works better if you put the part to   
   encapsulated under vacuum before you pour on the encapsulant.   
      
   I've never seen it done, but I've heard about it. It's apparently very   
   messy.   
      
   --   
   Bill Sloman, Sydney   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca