XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics   
   From: jj@j.j   
      
   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:   
   > Bill Sloman wrote:   
   > > On 6/02/2026 11:24 am, Jeremiah Jones wrote:   
   > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:   
   > >>> Jeremiah Jones wrote:   
   > >>> ^^^^^^^^   
   > >>> Again, you need to specify an actual e-mail address there.   
   > >>> And stop this mindless crossposting without Followup-To, *please*.   
   > >>   
   > >> You need to stop being such a fuss budget.   
   > >>   
   > >> I'll post what I want, where I want, the way I want, and you'll like it.   
   > >   
   > > You can post what you like. This is an unmoderated group.   
   > > We don't have to like it, and we can and will ignore you if you don't   
   > > have anything useful to say.   
   >   
   > Full ACK.   
   >   
   > >>>> ehsjr wrote:   
   > >>>>> On 2/2/2026 11:50 AM, Jeremiah Jones wrote:   
   > >>>>>> Earth *is* a magnet. It is pushed by the magnetic fields of the sun   
   > >>>>>> and galaxies. That's what makes the earth go round the sun.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> That's why they're worried about magnetic pole reversal. We'll start   
   > >>>>> orbiting the sun in the opposite direction. Or maybe it will just make   
   > >>>>> time go backwards. Who knows?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> It can at least makes time stand still.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> No, it cannot.   
   > >>   
   > >> Already proven. >   
   > >> The missing 2 hours caused a singular discontinuity in the spacetime   
   > >> fabric. Its all over your head.   
   >   
   > JFTR: I have studied Physics, including special and general relativity.   
   > So this is a very ludicrous claim by yet another wannabe/crackpot on the Net.   
      
   Wait, Tom, JFTR. Didn't you say your plonking me? Plonk means you   
   don't read my posts or reply to them anymore. It doesn't mean you keep   
   up the conversation through 3rd hand replies.   
      
   Yeah, we know, you just had to play your "Im smarter than you" card.   
   Reading wikipedia doesn't mean you "studied Physics". If thats so then   
   I studied just as much with a GED as you. You really need to study how   
   to stop being a horse's ass. And read usenet long enough to read some   
   real netiqette, cuz everything you think you know about that is wrong.   
      
      
      
   > More importantly, contrary to what you can read in most popular-scientific   
   > texts, spacetime is NOT a "fabric". It is a manifold (a special   
      
   It's fabric like cotton and spandex. Shut up or call the spacetime   
   police.   
      
      
   > > And what's your evidence that this discontinuity exists (or ever   
   > > existed). The Old Testament is just a repeatedly copied ancient text.   
   > > The copying process isn't error free.   
   >   
   > In addition to being propagated first by word-of-mouth (oral tradition) and   
      
   I was not the one who brought up the bible. Your opinion about it is   
   not important. Go argue about it with Bill in the religion groups. Tell   
   them all about how you cant see sunspots with your telescope. Better   
   yet, take a close look at them with your highly educated reflector.   
      
      
   > only much later told to scribes, and then copied by scribes from papyrus to   
   > parchment and vellum to paper, and translated from Hebrew to Aramaic to   
   > Koine Greek to Old English etc.   
      
   You obviously never read a Old English Bible.   
      
      
   > This does not have much to do with any of the sciences for which the groups   
   > have been set up that this had been crossposted to.   
      
   Then you better plonk me again, good buddy. It might take 6 or 8 times.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|