Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.design    |    Electronic circuit design    |    143,326 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 142,625 of 143,326    |
|    Martin Brown to john larkin    |
|    Re: usenet weirdness    |
|    10 Feb 26 10:30:18    |
      From: '''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk              On 09/02/2026 17:48, john larkin wrote:       > If I reply to posts from the pointy-ear guy, they go to sci.astro,       > even though his posts are in sci.electronics.design.              There is nothing odd about it at all. He has set followups to sci.astro       which is now a hell hole where all the lunatic fringe nutters hang out.              sci.astro.amateur and .moderated was created to separate the deranged       nutters with their NEW THEROY (sic) OF THE UNIVERSE all in CAPS from       people who wanted to talk about astronomy. It worked for a while too.              Your Usenet client is doing *exactly* what it is supposed to do.              > This is agent/eternal september.       >       > The issue was       >       >> 3. By contrast to light, gravitational waves are quadrupole waves that are       >> only emitted when the spacetime curvature changes in a non-spherically       >> symmetric way. They are also emitted by objects and systems which do not       >> emit light.       >       > Suppose that somewhere out in free space a cannonball somehow       > appeared. Wouldn't that create a symmetric, spherical gravitational       > wave?              E = mc^2              It is not possible to violate conservation of mass energy in the way       that you propose with enough mass to have an appreciable gravitational       effect. Quantum mechanics uncertainty principle puts very strict bounds       on how much mass/energy you can spirit into existence and for how long.              The simplest system that can create gravitational waves is a close       binary star system. Ones with two pulsars in are very handy tests of       relativity. I was at the seminar where that discovery was announced.              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hulse–Taylor_pulsar#Use_as_a_tes       _of_general_relativity              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_J0737−3039              LIGO sees them only in the very final stages of orbital when they go       down the plug hole with a big crunch.              > Microphones some distance away, in any direction, would hear a click       > some time later.              If you could do it and on a large enough scale then it would perturb the       orbits of objects but only after enough time has elapsed for its       influence to reach them (and it would switch on suddenly in a step).              However, conservation of mass-energy prevents it from being possible.              This was always the problem with Newtonian gravitation - to avoid having       the Earth spiral into the sun in classical mechanics the speed of       Newtonian gravity has to be infinite. IOW It has to be an exactly       central force between the two centres of mass at every instant in time.              GR gets around this by redefining what is a straight line so that the       influence of the sun is handled by the curvature of spacetime itself.              --       Martin Brown              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca