XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: PointedEars@web.de   
      
   Bill Sloman wrote:   
   > On 14/02/2026 9:17 pm, Thomas Heger wrote:   
   >> Am Freitag000013, 13.02.2026 um 18:41 schrieb Bill Sloman:   
   >>> On 13/02/2026 8:03 pm, Thomas Heger wrote:   
   >>>> Most of these objections came actually from physicists.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> E.g. there was a physics professor with some reputation named Herbert   
   >>>> Dingle, who wrote 'Science at the crossroads'.   
      
   Once again: Dingle became a nutcase over his objection to special relativity   
   :-D   
      
   >>>> I personally have analyzed Einstein's 'On the electrodynamics of   
   >>>> moving bodies' of 1905 and found, that it contains roughly four-   
   >>>> hundred errors.   
      
   Once again: You are "discussing" with a well-known crackpot who is probably   
   a nutcase, too :-D   
      
   >>>> That particular article violated all known rules for scientific   
   >>>> papers and contains about 100 serious(!) errors in all possible   
   >>>> circumstances.   
   >>>   
   >>> Max Planck didn't bother to send it out for peer-review.   
      
   Once again: He was not even the editor of the journal that Einstein   
   submitted the paper to :-D   
      
   >> Sure. But I have not fully understood this fact, because Planck was   
   >> definitely able to see the errors in that paper.   
   >   
   > He saw things in it that he disliked, [...]   
      
   Cite evidence, or retract your outlandish claims.   
      
   F'up2 sci.physics.relativity   
      
   --   
   PointedEars   
      
   Twitter: @PointedEars2   
   Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)