home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.electronics.design      Electronic circuit design      143,102 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 142,876 of 143,102   
   Bill Sloman to Ross Finlayson   
   Re: energy and mass   
   19 Feb 26 21:02:44   
   
   XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: bill.sloman@ieee.org   
      
   On 19/02/2026 7:54 am, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   > On 02/18/2026 12:49 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >> On 02/18/2026 12:43 PM, Python wrote:   
   >>> Le 18/02/2026 à 20:13, Ross Finlayson a écrit :   
   >>> ..   
   >>>> and, you know, magnetic monopoles, is widely employed   
   >>>> in medical imaging and the like.   
   >>>   
   >>> No.   
   >>   
   >> Resonance imaging (NMR) is a thoroughly different mechanism   
   >> than Roentgen rays.   
   >>   
   >> Mathematically and in the theory also.   
   >>   
   >> In duck typing if it essentially is a magnetic monopole   
   >> then it is what it is. Now go look at skyrmions and spintronics.   
   >   
   > It's like we were just talking about Einstein and the   
   > "Principle of Relativity" circa 1923 when basically   
   > he gives an account for Electrodynamics that exactly   
   > the polar opposite and an inaccessible singularity   
   > the "having it both ways".   
   >   
   > Continuity and infinity are surely integral the   
   > mathematics, thus the mathematical physics,   
   > then here for accounts like space inversion   
   > and simply enough the convolutional setting   
   > and singular integrals and the like, and the   
   > hypergeometric, with the hypergeometric's   
   > regular singular points: zero, one, and infinity.   
      
   This is a remarkably moronic assertion.   
      
   The mathematics of integer numbers is discontinuous and doesn't depend   
   on any concept of infinity.   
      
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric   
      
   covers a number of different ideas. You haven't specified what you think   
   you are talking about, so looks pretty much as if you are a nitwit who   
   doesn't know what he is talking about.   
      
   > It's not just that super-symmetry isn't dead:   
   > also there are at least three kinds.   
   >   
   > All one theory, where for example gravity itself   
   > is a giant violation of conservation of energy   
   > in the usual, premier theories.   
      
   More assertions that are intended to be impressive, and fail, big-time.   
      
   --   
   Bill Sloman, Sydney   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca