home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.electronics.design      Electronic circuit design      143,326 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 142,947 of 143,326   
   john larkin to pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.   
   Re: Negative Supply Rejection Sucks (1/2   
   20 Feb 26 13:21:47   
   
   From: jl@glen--canyon.com   
      
   e`On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 16:05:26 -0500, Phil Hobbs   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-02-19 21:57, Phil Hobbs wrote:   
   >> On 2026-02-19 14:16, john larkin wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:50:52 -0500, Phil Hobbs   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-02-18 22:34, john larkin wrote:   
   >>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 22:12:12 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Is generally the pits.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Anybody got a fave negative regulator with decent PSR?  I need a   
   >>>>>> few rails   
   >>>>>> at no more than 150 mA, and the landscape is bleak.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The 337-style ones seem to rule the roost, and they stink.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I’m thinking of using TCA0372s, but they don’t have a PSR spec at all.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Cheers   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Phil Hobbs   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> TPS723xx claims ultra low noise and high PSRR.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I like to put an RC at the input of a lin reg. That improves hf psrr,   
   >>>>> shares some power dissipation, and gives me a way to measure the   
   >>>>> current.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I like to bypass the top resistor in a feedback divider too.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> About 20 dB at 10 kHz. :(  They're almost all like that.   
   >>>   
   >>> I guess that the substrate is the unreg input on a negative regulator,   
   >>> so it couples into everything.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I've got a four-pole RLC LPF on each input that's -3 dB at 12 kHz and   
   >>>> (theoretically) -100 dB at 300 kHz, before veering off into spherical   
   >>>> meadows of -150 to -220 dB from 1  to 50 MHz. ;)   Simulation shows no   
   >>>> peaking and no overshoot.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>        1 ohm        2 ohm    47u   
   >>>> Supply 0---POLYSWITCH--*--RRRR--*--LLLLLL---*--0  --> vregs   
   >>>>                         |        |           |   
   >>>>         4.7 uF (about  CCC      CCC 4.7uF   CCC   
   >>>>         3.3 @ 15V)     CCC      CCC         CCC 2x 4.7uF   
   >>>>                         |        |           |   
   >>>>                        GND      GND         GND   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Maybe get some 150 uF polymer caps?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> The caps are all CL31B475KAHNNNE (1206, X7R, 5 cents) and the inductor   
   >>>> is ANR6045T470M (6mm x 6mm, 0.25 ohm ESR, also 5 cents). I'm splurging   
   >>>> on the polyswitch (RXEF030, about 12 cents).  That's seven parts on each   
   >>>> polarity, amortized over all the rails, not counting the RF bypass cap   
   >>>> and TVS (SMBJ15A, about 8 cents).   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The regulators typically have 50 dB-ish rejection near DC, some   
   >>>> considerably less, but then go into the tank above 1 kHz or so, like   
   >>>> 20-25 dB at 10 kHz.  (Lasse's one is about 20 dB better there, for an   
   >>>> extra buck per rail).  Discrete front ends have no PSR to speak of, so I   
   >>>> really need > 60 dB from hum frequencies to 10 kHz, and much better   
   >>>> above there.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So it's looking like a cap multiplier supervised by an LM4041 shunt   
   >>>> reference as the next stage.  That's about a dozen parts per rail, which   
   >>>> isn't brilliant.  It's hard to share them, because two of the rails need   
   >>>> to be near the negative input supply.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Humph.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Maybe make a regulator with an opamp and a mosfet or bipolar follower?   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm lucky, I guess, that I don't have to sweat over pennies. Our   
   >>> selling price over parts cost ratio is pretty high. I'd hate to be   
   >>> making stuff where a gang of competitors are battling over price.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> I think that's right.  N-type Si substrates certainly exist, but IIRC   
   >> they aren't common except for some photodiodes.  One might wish that the   
   >> old saying "reverse polarity and use PNPs" were more applicable to   
   >> low-cost bipolar processes. ;)   
   >>   
   >> Re: Regulator   
   >>   
   >> After doing something fancier, and then Muntzing it down, I managed to   
   >> make a reasonable regulator (60ish dB near DC, 70ish from a few   
   >> kilohertz up) with only 10 cheap parts.  No current limit, but oh   
   >> well--the quiet supply doesn't have to run any external outputs.  It   
   >> piggybacks a bit from a -5V rail generated by an LM337L, which saves a   
   >> zener diode for biasing the cascode transistor on the LM4041-Adj.   
   >>   
   >> I had to fudge the modeal a bit, because none of the LM4041-Adj models I   
   >> can find actually work in LTspice. (Dunno about pspice.)  Even the   
   >> TLV431 models don't seem to work in AC mode--they don't sink any current   
   >> for some reason.   
   >>   
   >> The LM4041 and LM385 adjustable refs look like a PNP   
   >> transistor--feedback makes the reference voltage appear between ADJ and   
   >> cathode, so if you want 1.2V, you connect ADJ to anode.  That's super   
   >> useful for negative supplies, because you can ground the anode and   
   >> connect the feedback divider between output and ground.   
   >>   
   >> The more common TLV431 and its ilk are NPN-style, where the reference   
   >> voltage appears between ADJ and anode, and connecting ADJ to cathode   
   >> makes a 1.2V reference.   
   >>   
   >> To make the NPN-style work like a PNP, there's a voltage-controlled   
   >> voltage (e) source to effectively move the reference terminals.   
   >> Hopefully the AC characteristics of the two chips are similar   
   >> enough--the mid- and high-frequency behavior is mostly determined by the   
   >> BJT and passives anyway.   
   >>   
   >> Here's the current iteration, including a screen shot.  Unfortunately   
   >> the LM4041 model doesn't seem to work in .ac mode, so it's several .tran   
   >> simulations instead.   
   >>   
   >>    
   >>   
   >   
   >I just did some positive PSR measurements on a TCA0372.  Conditions were   
   >a single +10V supply with 200 mV p-p sinusoidal ripple, courtesy of my   
   >trusty Siglent arb.  I had to use one of our LA-22 100x precision low   
   >noise lab amps to be able to see the feedthrough on a scope.  (I could   
   >also have broken out the lock-in, of course.)   
   >   
   >Amp is wired as a follower, with a 3.3V lithium battery providing its   
   >input.  PSR is calculated as   
   >   
   >PSR = 20*log(p-p ripple/200 mV)   
   >   
   >Verdict: Awesome.   
   >   
   >Freq	Ripple	PSR   
   >   
   >1 kHz	3 uV	96 dB   
   >10 kHz  5 uV	92 dB   
   >20 kHz	14 uV	83 dB   
   >50 kHz	12 uV	84 dB   
   >100 kHz	40 uV	74 dB	   
   >200 kHz 500 uV	52 dB   
   >   
   >This is a lot better than an LM317.   
   >   
   >My 25-cent RLC filter is 100 dB down at 300 kHz, so I should be laughing   
   >as far as the positive rails are concerned.   
   >   
   >Cheers   
   >   
   >Phil Hobbs   
      
   Are you planning to use the TCA power opamp as the voltage regulator?   
   That makes sense, since I think you want two regs anyhow.   
      
   We did some testing on that amp.  The current limiting mostly doesn't   
   work so you can blow it up. It can be made c-load stable.   
      
      
      
      
   John Larkin   
   Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center   
   Lunatic Fringe Electronics   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca