home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.electronics.design      Electronic circuit design      143,102 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 142,997 of 143,102   
   Phil Hobbs to john larkin   
   Re: Negative Supply Rejection Sucks (1/2   
   22 Feb 26 00:26:18   
   
   From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net   
      
   john larkin  wrote:   
   > On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:39 -0500, Phil Hobbs   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2026-02-20 16:21, john larkin wrote:   
   >>> e`On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 16:05:26 -0500, Phil Hobbs   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-02-19 21:57, Phil Hobbs wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2026-02-19 14:16, john larkin wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:50:52 -0500, Phil Hobbs   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2026-02-18 22:34, john larkin wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 22:12:12 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Is generally the pits.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Anybody got a fave negative regulator with decent PSR?  I need a   
   >>>>>>>>> few rails   
   >>>>>>>>> at no more than 150 mA, and the landscape is bleak.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> The 337-style ones seem to rule the roost, and they stink.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I’m thinking of using TCA0372s, but they don’t have a PSR spec at   
   all.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Cheers   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Phil Hobbs   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> TPS723xx claims ultra low noise and high PSRR.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I like to put an RC at the input of a lin reg. That improves hf psrr,   
   >>>>>>>> shares some power dissipation, and gives me a way to measure the   
   >>>>>>>> current.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I like to bypass the top resistor in a feedback divider too.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> About 20 dB at 10 kHz. :(  They're almost all like that.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I guess that the substrate is the unreg input on a negative regulator,   
   >>>>>> so it couples into everything.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I've got a four-pole RLC LPF on each input that's -3 dB at 12 kHz and   
   >>>>>>> (theoretically) -100 dB at 300 kHz, before veering off into spherical   
   >>>>>>> meadows of -150 to -220 dB from 1  to 50 MHz. ;)   Simulation shows   
   no   
   >>>>>>> peaking and no overshoot.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>        1 ohm        2 ohm    47u   
   >>>>>>> Supply 0---POLYSWITCH--*--RRRR--*--LLLLLL---*--0  --> vregs   
   >>>>>>>                         |          
   |           |   
   >>>>>>>         4.7 uF (about  CCC      CCC 4.7uF   CCC   
   >>>>>>>         3.3 @ 15V)     CCC      CCC           
   CCC 2x 4.7uF   
   >>>>>>>                         |          
   |           |   
   >>>>>>>                        GND        
   GND         GND   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Maybe get some 150 uF polymer caps?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The caps are all CL31B475KAHNNNE (1206, X7R, 5 cents) and the inductor   
   >>>>>>> is ANR6045T470M (6mm x 6mm, 0.25 ohm ESR, also 5 cents). I'm splurging   
   >>>>>>> on the polyswitch (RXEF030, about 12 cents).  That's seven parts on   
   each   
   >>>>>>> polarity, amortized over all the rails, not counting the RF bypass cap   
   >>>>>>> and TVS (SMBJ15A, about 8 cents).   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The regulators typically have 50 dB-ish rejection near DC, some   
   >>>>>>> considerably less, but then go into the tank above 1 kHz or so, like   
   >>>>>>> 20-25 dB at 10 kHz.  (Lasse's one is about 20 dB better there, for an   
   >>>>>>> extra buck per rail).  Discrete front ends have no PSR to speak of,   
   so I   
   >>>>>>> really need > 60 dB from hum frequencies to 10 kHz, and much better   
   >>>>>>> above there.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So it's looking like a cap multiplier supervised by an LM4041 shunt   
   >>>>>>> reference as the next stage.  That's about a dozen parts per rail,   
   which   
   >>>>>>> isn't brilliant.  It's hard to share them, because two of the rails   
   need   
   >>>>>>> to be near the negative input supply.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Humph.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Maybe make a regulator with an opamp and a mosfet or bipolar follower?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I'm lucky, I guess, that I don't have to sweat over pennies. Our   
   >>>>>> selling price over parts cost ratio is pretty high. I'd hate to be   
   >>>>>> making stuff where a gang of competitors are battling over price.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I think that's right.  N-type Si substrates certainly exist, but IIRC   
   >>>>> they aren't common except for some photodiodes.  One might wish that the   
   >>>>> old saying "reverse polarity and use PNPs" were more applicable to   
   >>>>> low-cost bipolar processes. ;)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Re: Regulator   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> After doing something fancier, and then Muntzing it down, I managed to   
   >>>>> make a reasonable regulator (60ish dB near DC, 70ish from a few   
   >>>>> kilohertz up) with only 10 cheap parts.  No current limit, but oh   
   >>>>> well--the quiet supply doesn't have to run any external outputs.  It   
   >>>>> piggybacks a bit from a -5V rail generated by an LM337L, which saves a   
   >>>>> zener diode for biasing the cascode transistor on the LM4041-Adj.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I had to fudge the modeal a bit, because none of the LM4041-Adj models I   
   >>>>> can find actually work in LTspice. (Dunno about pspice.)  Even the   
   >>>>> TLV431 models don't seem to work in AC mode--they don't sink any current   
   >>>>> for some reason.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The LM4041 and LM385 adjustable refs look like a PNP   
   >>>>> transistor--feedback makes the reference voltage appear between ADJ and   
   >>>>> cathode, so if you want 1.2V, you connect ADJ to anode.  That's super   
   >>>>> useful for negative supplies, because you can ground the anode and   
   >>>>> connect the feedback divider between output and ground.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The more common TLV431 and its ilk are NPN-style, where the reference   
   >>>>> voltage appears between ADJ and anode, and connecting ADJ to cathode   
   >>>>> makes a 1.2V reference.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> To make the NPN-style work like a PNP, there's a voltage-controlled   
   >>>>> voltage (e) source to effectively move the reference terminals.   
   >>>>> Hopefully the AC characteristics of the two chips are similar   
   >>>>> enough--the mid- and high-frequency behavior is mostly determined by the   
   >>>>> BJT and passives anyway.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Here's the current iteration, including a screen shot.  Unfortunately   
   >>>>> the LM4041 model doesn't seem to work in .ac mode, so it's several .tran   
   >>>>> simulations instead.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>    
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I just did some positive PSR measurements on a TCA0372.  Conditions were   
   >>>> a single +10V supply with 200 mV p-p sinusoidal ripple, courtesy of my   
   >>>> trusty Siglent arb.  I had to use one of our LA-22 100x precision low   
   >>>> noise lab amps to be able to see the feedthrough on a scope.  (I could   
   >>>> also have broken out the lock-in, of course.)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Amp is wired as a follower, with a 3.3V lithium battery providing its   
   >>>> input.  PSR is calculated as   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca