Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.repair    |    Fixing electronic equipment    |    124,944 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 123,001 of 124,944    |
|    Peter W. to All    |
|    Re: Why I like to help people with (Elec    |
|    25 Jul 22 11:13:58    |
      From: peterwieck33@gmail.com              Yikes!!              a) What is known of the Universe may be extrapolated backwards in time. All a       telescope does, whatever type of radiation it observes, is look backward in       time.       b) It is a pretty linear extrapolation based on the data observed to follow       distributed energy back to a (probably) single point.       c) And, this really is basic, established science based on direct observation       of specific evidence that also is repeatable.       d) CERN has told us a great deal on how matter is formed, how it holds       together, how it behaves and more.       e) It turns out that even this is predictable and repeatable. Making it also       basic science.       f) However, we still do not know what we do not know.       g) Clarke's Third Law: Science, sufficiently advanced, is indistinguishable       from magic.              William of Occam suggests that one should not needlessly multiply entities.              See this as a multiple choice problem:              1. There is a "GOD" in the Christian/Muslim/Jewish model, complete/replete       with all the various trappings assigned thereto.       2. There is a Prime Mover that is self-aware.       3. There is/are forces that is/are responsible/resulted in the 'big bang'.        Said force/forces need not be self-aware, intelligent, self-directed, nor       anything else other than (a) Force/Forces.              Which is the simplest explanation?              There are those who believe that fetal recapitulation is proof of       God/Intelligent Design.       There are those that believe just the opposite.       Point being that evidence-in-a-vacuum leads to a potential for m       sinterpretation. As, both cannot be correct in the above example.              Writing for myself, I am much happier believing that I am more-or-less       responsible for my state in this world - and not living at the whim of some       probably malicious, certainly capricious, demonstrably not benign 'creator'.              Peter Wieck       Melrose Park, PA              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca