On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:43:42 -0400, micky    
   wrote:   
      
   >No one in popular news talked about AI 6 months ago and all of sudden   
   >it's everywhere.   
   >   
   >The most recent discussion I heard was about "using AI to read X-rays   
   >and other medical imaging".   
   >   
   >They have computer programs that will "look" at, examine, x-rays etc.   
   >and find medical problems, sometimes ones that the radiologist misses.   
   >   
   >So it's good if both look them.   
   >   
   >But is it AI? Seems to me it one slightly complicated algorith and   
   >comes nowhere close to AI. The Turing test for example.   
   >   
   >And that lots of thigns they are calling AI these days are just slightly   
   >or moderately complicated computer programs, black boxes maybe, but not   
   >AI.   
   >   
   >What say you?   
      
   Designing machines for looking at images and finding specific items   
   like unexpected growths is quite simple. That's not AI. Simple 3 layer   
   neural networks can learn to do that already. When machines do things   
   they are not supposed to do that may be by using a form of AI. When my   
   washing machine starts making meals for me that could be described as   
   AI!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|