XPost: sci.electronics.design
From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net
bitrex wrote:
> On 4/4/2024 7:56 AM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
>> Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund wrote:
>>> On 01-04-2024 09:01, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>> On a sunny day (Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:41:18 +0100) it happened Cursitor Doom
>>>> wrote in <9k7j0jlnbhs8qfg5m17pium0835meean83@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm starting to get a bit fed up with having my test equipment blow up
>>>>> just when it's needed. This is the drawback with vintage gear; if it's
>>>>> not used frequently then it can go *bang* the next time you switch it
>>>>> on. It makes for good practice in repairing stuff, but wastes a lot of
>>>>> time which could be better spent doing other things.
>>>>> I think it's time I modernised my test gear. I was just wondering if
>>>>> anyone has any recommendations they can share. Is there a particular
>>>>> piece of test equipment you couldn't live without? Something you're
>>>>> particularly impressed with? I'd be interested to know so I can
>>>>> perhaps acquire said item and thereby reduce the number of explosions
>>>>> I experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> CD.
>>>>
>>>> My 10 MHz Trio dual trace analog scope is from 1979 or there about, I
>>>> blew up a channal once myself in the first week
>>>> when I accidently touched a booster diode in a TV I was repairing with
>>>> it, fixed it locating the problem with the other channel.
>>>> Later I cracked the graticule when a soldering station fell on it from
>>>> the table (scope stands on the ground)
>>>> Made a new graticule.
>>>> So, and still working perfectly, OK for all things I build with micros.
>>>> For RF to about 1.6 GHz I use RTL_SDR USB sticks and the spectrum
analyzer I wrote.
>>>> and for AC DC measurements I have some made in China digital meters and
an analog one.
>>>> also a Voltcraft clamp-on meter for current when you do not - or cannot
>>>> interrupt things with the meter impedance.
>>>> Also have a Voltcraft soldering station.
>>>> Blew up one of my digital meters a while back (volts on the resistance
>>>> scale) but fixed it again (replaced resistor).
>>>> Many other test equipment I designed and build, like amplifiers LF and
>>>> RF, SWR meter, radiation meters, gamma spectrometer,
>>>> GHz stuff for satelite, transmitters low and very high power, what not,
>>>> a frequency converter to use the RTL-SDR sticks and so the spectrum
>>>> analyzer on higher and lower frequencies.
>>>> Have a SARK100 SWR analyzer too.
>>>> Things last forever here...
>>>> Scope used on a regular basis..
>>>> RTL-SDR stick 24/7.
>>>> Digital meters used every day.
>>>> Use my self designed lab power supply every day..
>>>> What more do you need?
>>>> Learn to use the stuff, understand what's important, and that is it
>>>> When I started in electronics as a kid I did not even _have_ a meter,
>>>> still stuff worked.
>>>> Build my own scope at some point back then
>>>> when I somehow got the parts
>>>> Not much pocket mony as a kid.
>>>> UNDERSTAND your systems, what electrons do.
>>>> Showing of with boat anchors may impress people, especially the
clueless...
>>>> But it does not help you one bit.
>>>> Anything with an accuracy better than 1 percent in most cases is just
>>>> like apes screaming load trying to impress other apes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Very true about specifically the 1% statement. Sidebar, at an earlier
>>> employment, we needed to equip a new lab. Guys wanted GHz scopes. When
>>> asked if the ever looked at edges faster than 1ns, no one did.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It’s true that there are a lot of relatively undemanding jobs in
>> electronics. You can get on fine with a 200-MHz scope if all you’re doing
>> is PIC and Pi and ham radio and analog TV.
>>
>> It’s also true that you can often make do with what you have—the most
>> important test instrument is the one between your ears.
>>
>> In the before times, doctors were much better with stethoscopes than they
>> are now.
>>
>> But I’d sure prefer a cardiologist who could use tomography and ultrasound
>> over the best stethoscope guy.
>>
>> And it’s a lot easier finding gigahertz oscillations if you aren’t
limited
>> to a 10-MHz
>> scope with scale marks in cuneiform.
>>
>> Good boat anchors make capability like that very affordable. My lab is full
>> of top-of-the-line gear (over $2M at list price), for which I’ve paid
about
>> 2-3 cents on the dollar. (Not counting a few very helpful donations early
>> on.) Of course I have some good newer stuff, such as a two-channel arb, a
>> NanoVNA2, and a logic analyzer with protocol decoding.
>>
>> It’s a bit old-school-looking, so it doesn’t impress visitors unless
they
>> actually know something, and that suits me perfectly well.
>>
>> But by all means don’t buy any, so it’ll keep being cheap for me. ;)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Phil Hobbs
>>
>
> My most useful old machine dollar for dollar is my 8012B pulse generator!
>
>
>
> $50 "not working." It was just a burned-out pilot lamp and dirty controls.
>
I used to have an 8013B, which is the dual channel version.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
