From: sophyan2003@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, July 2, 2020 at 2:40:56 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:   
   > Sorry friends of mathematics if you truly don't like this well-known   
   numerical counter-example that was already given to you earlier where this is   
   never the end of mathematics itself but the end of the so-called fabricated   
   and very wrong mathematics    
   where also numerical counterexamples are uncountable     
   >    
   >  And we know that should be the headline and world press news if the whole   
   mathematical world communities were ever noticeable or even comparable by the   
   larger whole world news of saying randomly comparable to a skilled footballer   
   boy (not necessarily    
   the best) or a singer's shoos's colour or a very corrupted politician or even   
   comparable to a young check star of Tick TOOK in today's standard world   
   >    
   >    
   >  I know also that it is from the seventh impossible for an academic   
   professional mathematicians not to understand those refuted facts from those   
   many uncountable Diophantine Equations given to you in so many occasions with   
   full irrefutable proofs that    
   need the complete obedience of every one since they were truly, sincerely and   
   so, unfortunately, a middle school level strictly   
   >    
   >  I know that even those few (unbiased, honest, Nobel) Academic researchers   
   (not necessarily in mathematics, if ever existing) don't like this truth to be   
   taught to school students for many will-exposed and so irrelevant reasons   
   >    
   >           
   >  But the superior facts in your own mathematics are truly much more of a   
   higher value than ALL your (desires, needs, excuses, philosophy, logic,   
   personal or incurable physicological mental disorders problems, ego,  ...,   
   etc)     
   >    
   >  So to say, for how long would you keep hiding and running away where   
   everything was already exposed and in many secretive minds settled? Wonders   
   >     
   >  Do you truly still acting deaf, blind and clueless as always as usual?   
   >    
   >    
   >   Do you want truly BIG HIBTS?   
   >    
   >  OK, take it again and again until you completely get it and so   
   unfortunately without your choice or any agreement, since school kids are   
   going to learn it  for day and night and much faster than you do, FOR SURE   
   >    
   >    
   >   This is only one form of those many uncountable insolvable Diaphontine   
   Equations (in non-zero integers) we are talking about for years by NOW:   
   >    
   >                 (n^3 = 3nm^2 + m^3)   
   >    
   >  Note: Don't ask any moderated sites like Stalk Exchange because they can't   
   tolerate such simple facts and will delete it immediately FOR SURE   
   >    
   >  Good lucks   
   >    
   >  Regards   
   >    
   >  Bassam Karzeddin   
      
   Sorry to add this nice wisdom for global academic mainstream mathematicians   
   who especially speak, write and understand the English Language, since I don't   
   know truly if my contents issues were written in many other languages the   
   result may not be    
   necessarily the same as null as incomprehensible   
      
    The old Arabic Wisdom says "Repetition teaches the donkey"   
      
    And assuming YOU are the one who should I do keep repeating constantly my old   
   irrefutable public published proofs for (her/him), where finally you must get   
   it and act accordingly and never be so openly big deniers (as always as usual   
   and strictly in    
   mathematics)   
      
    Also no need to be at all thankful, since this is rare free of coast teaching   
      
    And to save your so valuable time I wouldn't waste it in tinny simple    
   details that anyone can immediately deduce (as was shown to you earlier)   
      
    The proof:   
      
    Consider this insolvable Diaphontine Equation in non-zero integers   
      
     (n^3 = 3nm^2 + m^3), where (n, m) are coprime integers (in their absolute   
   value), where (m > 1) divides exactly the RHS but doesn't divide exactly the   
   LHS   
      
    Hence, a contradiction implies unsolvability of that D. Eqn (in our   
   magazine), where proof is completed   
      
    And no existing integers (n, m) ever exists to satisfy this D. Eqn. , nor   
   would be any existing real number as (x = n/m), since it is a ratio of two no   
   existing numbers     
      
    Now, knowing this undeniable fact, and deciding in advance with my full   
   intention to cheat your so innocent minds, to obtain one real solution and two   
   more complex solutions by applying this devilish so silly mind trick (by   
   dividing the whole D.Eqn. by    
   the term (m^3), and letting (x = n/m), then rearranging the terms to fabricate   
   this most wonderful irreducible cubic polynomial as (x^3 - 3x - 1 = 0), that   
   must have three roots in accordance with the ill-designed fundamental theorem   
   of algebra, with the    
   great magic help of that Cardano formula for roots   
      
    Ans abnormally for the cost (pi/9) as a real solution   
      
    So, to say the angle of 20 degrees that was impossible to construct   
      
    proof of Wentzel in 1837   
      
    But we already know that neither a constructible distance proof exists nor   
   any numerical expression valid to describe that alleged real (algebraic) root   
      
    So, we easily conclude the following facts   
      
    1) Real non-constructible (Irrational algebraic) numbers don't exist     
      
    2) Imaginary numbers were false, misleading and were wrong decisions in old   
   mathematics in the middle ages   
      
    3) Real numbers are discrete and only constructible numbers (because they   
   exist as existing distances), where continuously hypothesis is completely false   
      
    4) between two constructible numbers, there exist many uncountable   
   constructible numbers   
      
    5) No meaning at all for the old mathematical terms like (close enough,   
   tending to, limits, convergence, finite, infinite, large, small,  ..., etc)   
   since numbers are distances which are purely space properties that is itself   
   nothingness,     
      
    (i.e "Space" is a "place" that can't be bounded out worldly by fiction like   
   infinity nor can be bounded inwardly by fiction like zero)   
      
    6) The Wentzel proof (of the impossible constructions of three Old-Greeks    
   problems) was completely invalid in reasoning but true in conclusions about   
   such impossibilities that were never relevant to the Greek's tools of   
   construction but due to non-   
   existence of cube root two as a real number, nor the existence of the angle   
   (pi/9), nor the existence of the circle itself     
      
   7) The complete falsehood of the most famous fundamental theorem of algebra by   
   the much more rigorous Diaphontin Equations     
      
    8) The most famous Cardano formula is completely false since it contains a   
   false cube root operation which is only valid on very rare cases on perfect   
   cubes of an existing constructible numbers        
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)