Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,184 of 10,432    |
|    Nasser M. Abbasi to All    |
|    comment on fundamental design of Maple,     |
|    28 Oct 21 02:49:30    |
      From: nma@12000.org              I am not memeber of Quora web site, but I saw this post       on it which has most upvotes on the topic              https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-maple-and-mathematica              "Note that Sage is unlikely to be that competitor: its       fundamental design carries along the same flaws that Maple       and Mathematica have; most of those flaws were actually already       present in Macsyma years earlier, but the `conventional wisdom'       had not moved on to recognize these fundamental design flaws"              Unfortunately the post does not say what these fundamental design       flaws are. it is an old post from 6 years ago.              I wonder if any one would venture to guess or comment on what       these flaws might be? I am just curious to learn.              --Nasser              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca