Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,305 of 10,432    |
|    Albert Rich to Nasser M. Abbasi    |
|    Re: if integrand is defined only for x>0    |
|    08 May 23 20:25:20    |
      From: Albert_Rich@msn.com              On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 9:47:41 AM UTC-10, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote in part:              > Integrand is -2*ln(2*x) + ln(x^2) which is only defined for x>0       > on the real line because of the ln(2*x) term.               -2*ln(2*x) + ln(x^2) IS well defined for all x on the real line, except for       x=0. For example, ln(-1)=pi i.              Symbolic integrators that produce antiderivatives NOT valid over the entire       complex plane should at least clearly indicate the domain over which they are       valid.              Rubi gives valid antiderivatives for all real and complex values of the       integration variable AND the integrand's parameters.              Albert              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca