Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,472 of 10,432    |
|    Albert Rich to clicl...@freenet.de    |
|    Re: The A. F. Timofeev symbolic integrat    |
|    13 Nov 13 20:22:07    |
      From: Albert_Rich@msn.com              On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:56:55 AM UTC-10, clicl...@freenet.de wrote:              > The hypergeometric series here (and in Example 3) terminate for a       > non-negative integer exponent n, while the series for your evaluation of       > Examples 6a,b terminate (after applying Euler's transformation) for a       > negative integer exponent n. The latter type of representation is       > somewhat more compact; a disadvantage is that the antiderivative 6a for       > positive a,m,x ends up on the branch cut of the hypergeometric function.       > I therefore propose to normalize to the former type:              For the integral of (1+x)^n/x, Rubi currently returns              -(1+x)^(1+n) * 2F1(1,1+n,2+n,1+x) / (1+n)              In light of your comments above, would it be better to return              (1+x)^n * 2F1(-n,-n,1-n,-1/x) / (n*(1+1/x)^n) ?              Albert              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca