Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,487 of 10,432    |
|    Axel Vogt to Albert Rich    |
|    Re: error in an integral, Rubi 4.3, Quot    |
|    09 Dec 13 22:47:13    |
      From: &noreply@axelvogt.de              On 07.12.2013 00:51, Albert Rich wrote:       > On Friday, November 29, 2013 3:34:13 PM UTC-10, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:       >       > ... A simpler example of the same bug is       > Assuming[t>0, Int[Sqrt[(I+1)*(1+t+t^4)], t]]       > It occurs when t>0 because Rubi uses algebraic simplification to transform       the problem to       > Assuming[t>0, Int[Sqrt[I+1]*Sqrt[1+t+t^4], t]]       ...       > The just released version 4.4 of Rubi resolves the bug by splitting the       factors of the square-root and pulling the resulting constant factor out of       the integrand in a single step, yielding the guaranteed simpler problem       ...       > Note that Rubi 4.4 is still not able to find a closed-form antiderivative       for the above integrand or for your example.              Still curious: _is_ there a 'closed' form?              Maple 17 answers by a complicated expression by       using Elliptic E and F (and roots of the quadric).              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca