home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.math.symbolic      Symbolic algebra discussion      10,432 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,530 of 10,432   
   clicliclic@freenet.de to Albert Rich   
   Re: first anniversary of the IITS   
   08 Mar 14 15:22:30   
   
   Albert Rich schrieb:   
   >   
   > On Sunday, March 2, 2014 12:29:28 AM UTC-10, clicl...@freenet.de wrote:   
   >   
   > > I have done some extra work and arrived at the following alternative   
   > > evaluations for the Examples 62, 64, 66 (p. 268) and 118 (p. 309) from   
   > > Chapter 5:   
   > >   
   > > INT(SQRT(TAN(x)),x)=-1/SQRT(2)*ATANH((1+TAN(x))/(SQRT(2)*SQRT(TA~   
   > > N(x))))+1/SQRT(2)*ATAN(1+SQRT(2)*SQRT(TAN(x)))-1/SQRT(2)*ATAN(1-~   
   > > SQRT(2)*SQRT(TAN(x)))=-1/SQRT(2)*LN((1+TAN(x)+SQRT(2)*SQRT(TAN(x~   
   > > )))/SEC(x))+1/SQRT(2)*ATAN(1+SQRT(2)*SQRT(TAN(x)))-1/SQRT(2)*ATA~   
   > > N(1-SQRT(2)*SQRT(TAN(x)))   
   > >   
   > > [...]   
   >   
   > For example 62, you combined the two logs into an inverse hyperbolic   
   > tangent. The two inverse tangents can also be combined to yield the   
   > elegant antiderivative for sqrt(tan(x)):   
   >   
   > -ArcTan[(1-Tan[x])/(Sqrt[2]*Sqrt[Tan[x]])]/Sqrt[2] -   
   > ArcTanh[(1+Tan[x])/(Sqrt[2]*Sqrt[Tan[x]])]/Sqrt[2]   
   >   
   > Did you not do this because of continuity problems?   
   >   
      
   My interest in Example 44 (like the similar but simpler 62, 64, 66, and   
   118) was mostly in the asymmetric LN evaluation. Please fuse the ATAN's   
   in numbers 62, 64, 66 as you see fit; I find no continuity problems:   
      
   ATAN(1 + SQRT(2)*SQRT(TAN(x))) - ATAN(1 - SQRT(2)*SQRT(TAN(x)))   
    = ATAN((TAN(x) - 1)/(SQRT(2)*SQRT(TAN(x)))) + pi/2   
      
   ATAN(3 + SQRT(2)*SQRT(4 + 3*TAN(2*x)))   
    - ATAN(3 - SQRT(2)*SQRT(4 + 3*TAN(2*x)))   
    = ATAN((3*TAN(2*x) - 1)/(SQRT(2)*SQRT(3*TAN(2*x) + 4))) + pi/2   
      
   My original proposals for optimization usually excluded evaluations   
   merely differing in paired LN's rewritten as ATANH, or by the fusing or   
   splitting of ATAN and ATANH. However, in my optimized evaluations I   
   freely made such changes, always keeping an eye on the continuity   
   properties - this is why ACOTH appears in Example 81 (warning: this is   
   Derive's ACOTH, which differs from Mathematica's ArcCoth, I believe).   
   Discontinuities at integrand poles never worry me much; I propose that   
   definite integrals be split automatically where such poles reside in the   
   integration range (unless there are too many such poles, perhaps even an   
   infinite number).   
      
   I followed Timofeev in Examples 70-71 and 80 where a fused double ATAN   
   can be written as a simpler ASIN:   
      
   ATAN(1 + 2*COS(x)/SQRT(SIN(2*x))) - ATAN(1 - 2*COS(x)/SQRT(SIN(2*x)))   
    +- pi/2  = ATAN((COS(x) - SIN(x))/SQRT(SIN(2*x)))   
    = ASIN(COS(x) - SIN(x))   
      
   I similarly fused ATAN in Examples 77 and 81, but without using ASIN   
   because of the awkward piecewise constants.   
      
   ATAN was also fused in number 109, but not in 112 and 118 (no longer   
   mere square roots here, but continuity problems do not arise); we have:   
      
   ATAN((2*(1 - 3*SEC(x)^2)^(1/6) - 1)/SQRT(3))   
    - ATAN((2*(1 - 3*SEC(x)^2)^(1/6) + 1)/SQRT(3))   
    = ATAN((2*(1 - 3*SEC(x)^2)^(1/3) + 1)/SQRT(3)) - pi/2   
      
   ATAN((1 - 2*(1 + 2*COS(x)^9)^(1/6))/SQRT(3))   
    - ATAN((1 + 2*(1 + 2*COS(x)^9)^(1/6))/SQRT(3))   
    = ATAN((1 - (1 + 2*COS(x)^9)^(1/3))/(SQRT(3)*(1 + 2*COS(x)^9)^(1/6)))   
    - pi/2   
      
   ATAN(1 - SQRT(2)*COS(2*x)^(1/4)) - ATAN(1 + SQRT(2)*COS(2*x)^(1/4))   
    = ATAN((1 - SQRT(COS(2*x)))/(SQRT(2)*COS(2*x)^(1/4)))   
      
   I thought Examples 90-91 (p. 289) didn't merit attention, yet the ATAN's   
   in these two actually simplify on recombination or fusing:   
      
   INT((SIN(x)*COS(2*x)-2*(SIN(x)-1)*COS(x)^3)/(SIN(x)^2*SQRT(SIN(x~   
   )^2-5)),x)=(2+2/5*CSC(x))*SQRT(SIN(x)^2-5)-2*ATANH(SIN(x)/SQRT(S~   
   IN(x)^2-5))+2*ATAN(COS(x)/SQRT(SIN(x)^2-5))-2/SQRT(5)*ATAN(SQRT(~   
   SIN(x)^2-5)/SQRT(5))-1/SQRT(5)*ATAN(SQRT(5)*COS(x)/SQRT(SIN(x)^2~   
   -5))=(2+2/5*CSC(x))*SQRT(SIN(x)^2-5)-2*LN(SIN(x)+SQRT(SIN(x)^2-5~   
   ))+2*ATAN(COS(x)/SQRT(SIN(x)^2-5))-2/SQRT(5)*ATAN(SQRT(SIN(x)^2-~   
   5)/SQRT(5))-1/SQRT(5)*ATAN(SQRT(5)*COS(x)/SQRT(SIN(x)^2-5))   
      
   INT(COS(3*x)/(SQRT(3*COS(x)^2-SIN(x)^2)-SQRT(8*COS(x)^2-1)),x)=-~   
   1/2*SIN(x)*SQRT(4*COS(x)^2-1)-1/2*SIN(x)*SQRT(8*COS(x)^2-1)+3/4*~   
   ASIN(2*SIN(x)/SQRT(3))+5*SQRT(2)/8*ASIN(4*SIN(x)/SQRT(14))-3/4*A~   
   TAN(SIN(x)/SQRT(4*COS(x)^2-1))-3/4*ATAN(SIN(x)/SQRT(8*COS(x)^2-1~   
   ))   
      
   Sorry for having been a bit unsystematic.   
      
   Martin.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca