Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,541 of 10,432    |
|    Albert Rich to clicl...@freenet.de    |
|    Re: first anniversary of the IITS    |
|    23 Mar 14 16:59:08    |
      From: Albert_Rich@msn.com              On Sunday, March 23, 2014 6:12:12 AM UTC-10, clicl...@freenet.de wrote:              > I expect further problems to surface if the detailed term-by-term visual       > check is extended to the remaining Chapters (i.e. 2, 5, 6, 8). Misprints       > in Timofeev's integrands are likely to show up in this way, and       > unexpected possibilities of simpler evaluations might too.              Yes, a systematic check of the proposed optimal antiderivatives in the test       suite with the ones given in Timofeev's book may well turn up some simpler       ones. But having authored 2 of the systems being tested, I am obviously a       partisan in the symbolic        integration wars.               So instead of me, several members of the computer algebra community should       conduct a systematic check of the entire Charlwood and Timofeev test suites to       ensure they are optimal and unbiased. I would happy to provide such a       validation committee with        machine readable copies of the proposed test suites in the syntax of several       popular CA systems.              Albert              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca