Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,613 of 10,432    |
|    Axel Vogt to Axel Vogt    |
|    Re: Can someone solve this improper inte    |
|    02 Jul 14 20:36:51    |
      From: &noreply@axelvogt.de              On 02.07.2014 19:35, Axel Vogt wrote:       > On 02.07.2014 14:34, paulandrewbird@gmail.com wrote:       >> On Tuesday, 1 July 2014 20:43:02 UTC+1, Axel Vogt wrote:       >>> Do you have any (numerical) examples where your guess might be correct?       >>       >> My guess is simply based on the similarity to the quadratic integral:       >>       >> Integral[ exp(-A_ij x_i x_j )]dx^n = sqrt(pi^n / det(A) )       >       > If you mean the sum: for matrix = unit matrix then it is       > exp( x^2 + y^2 ) to be integrated over the plane, which       > is infinity, while det = 1. So at least you need sign       > conditions ( A = - Id will do)              PS: there is some issue with your formula               [-1 1]       for A = [ ] having det = +1 that means to integrate        [ 0 -1]              exp( -x^2+x*y-y^2 ), resulting in Pi * 2/sqrt(3)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca