Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,614 of 10,432    |
|    paulandrewbird@gmail.com to Axel Vogt    |
|    Re: Can someone solve this improper inte    |
|    02 Jul 14 16:22:40    |
      On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 19:36:51 UTC+1, Axel Vogt wrote:       > On 02.07.2014 19:35, Axel Vogt wrote:       >       > > On 02.07.2014 14:34, paulandrewbird@gmail.com wrote:       >       > >> On Tuesday, 1 July 2014 20:43:02 UTC+1, Axel Vogt wrote:       >       > >>> Do you have any (numerical) examples where your guess might be correct?       >       > >>       >       > >> My guess is simply based on the similarity to the quadratic integral:       >       > >>       >       > >> Integral[ exp(-A_ij x_i x_j )]dx^n = sqrt(pi^n / det(A) )       >       > >       >       > > If you mean the sum: for matrix = unit matrix then it is       >       > > exp( x^2 + y^2 ) to be integrated over the plane, which       >       > > is infinity, while det = 1. So at least you need sign       >       > > conditions ( A = - Id will do)       >       >       >       > PS: there is some issue with your formula       >       >       >       > [-1 1]       >       > for A = [ ] having det = +1 that means to integrate       >       > [ 0 -1]       >       >       >       > exp( -x^2+x*y-y^2 ), resulting in Pi * 2/sqrt(3)              Yeah you'd have to assume a symmetric matrix or you can replace det(A) with       det( (A+A^T)/2 ).              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca