Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,686 of 10,432    |
|    clicliclic@freenet.de to Albert Rich    |
|    Re: rubi ability?    |
|    02 Nov 14 18:09:27    |
      Albert Rich schrieb:       >       > It's always good to hear from a "big fan of Rubi"!       >       > Inspired in part by your post on September 7th, improvements made to       > the just released Rubi 4.6 enable it to integrate       > log(2+x)^3*log(3+x)*x^3 wrt x. The result is comparable in size to       > the Mathematica's and contains 6 polylogarithm functions.       >       > More generally Rubi 4.6 can integrate, at least in principle, any       > expression of the form       >       > Px F(g+h x)^m (a+b log(c (d (e+f x)^p)^q))       >       > wrt x where Px is a polynomial, m is a non-negative integer and F is       > log, arcsin, arccos, arctan, arccot, or their inverse hyperbolic       > counterparts.       >       > However, like the other systems tested, Rubi 4.6 is unable to       > integrate log(2+x)^3*log(3+x)^2*x^3 wrt x. I would guess this       > expressions is not integrable in terms of the elementary and       > polylogarithm functions(?).       >              I would guess so too. Do you find it too difficult to reduce the number       of polylogarithms, or just somehow inadvisable for a rule based system?              Martin.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca