Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,808 of 10,432    |
|    Albert Rich to Richard Fateman    |
|    Re: strange maxima error and how to prev    |
|    17 Jun 15 11:18:32    |
      From: Albert_Rich@msn.com              On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 5:22:55 AM UTC-10, Richard Fateman wrote:              >> Another problem I am finding, is that Maxima keeps asking for       >> verifications on some values during running the script, like this:       >>       >> Is ab positive or negative?       >> Is a zero or nonzero?       >       > It is asking these questions because it needs to know for getting       > the right answer.       > e.g. integrate(x^n,x) provokes the question "is n+1 zero or nonzero?"       >       > If you don't want to be asked, you can do this beforehand: assume(n>-1).       > or maybe assume(n<-1).       >       > Other systems may just plow on with a questionable answer or may respond       > with a complicated conditional answer... if (n=-1) then ln(x) else ....       > which may be correct but [a] generally stymies further processing of       > that expression and [b] probably fails to capture the current binding       > context of n,              Maxima returns 1 for n/n; whereas it returns "0 to a negative exponent" error       for 0/0. Instead of just plowing on with 1 for n/n, for consistency shouldn't       it ask if "is n zero or nonzero?"              Albert              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca