Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,816 of 10,432    |
|    jacob navia to All    |
|    How big is "infinite" precision?    |
|    22 Jun 15 20:17:46    |
      From: jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr              I am building an integer package with unlimited precision for my       compiler system lcc-win.              I have limited the size of the numbers to 65536 numbers of 31 bits each.              That gives numbers of 2 031 616 bits, that can represent numbers up to       pow(2, 2031616) --> 2.596 E+157 826, i e. numbers with more than 157       thousand digits.              Is that too small?              You use these kind of numbers here. Have you ever used numbers that need       to be bigger than that?              Each number at that precision takes 248Kbytes. 4096 numbers take a GB of       memory.              I had the number of digits in a 32 bit number that gives really       "unlimited" precision but I considered that a waste. I am wrong?              Thanks for your input              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca