Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,862 of 10,432    |
|    Basti05b@aol.com to All    |
|    Physics through DNA of Mathematics    |
|    24 Aug 15 10:17:15    |
      Physics through DNA of Mathematics              Hello:              I have had some interpretation of the physics of the universe in broad sense,       in my book DNA of Mathematics.              It is true that I am not a physicist, however I had several physics courses       during my undergraduate studies, and one of my professors was indeed student       of W. Heisenberg at Munich University.              Although as specialist in qualitative theory of ordinary differential       equations, I had come across many examples in science and engineering       problems, both during my graduate studies as well as my teachings for science       and engineering students.              Physicists have instruments for their investigations such as oscilloscope and       telescope etc.              I have only mathematical formulas on paper.              If you solve some Riccati equations, you have some understanding of the       behavior of systems associated with it, and I have hundreds of such       experiences.              Thus one can form a theory regarding physics issues on paper.              For example, Riccati equations have a characteristic that they are in a loop.       This is true for all Riccati equations.              Now if we demonstrate that Riccati equations are DNA of mathematics, then       since each motion has mathematical characteristic, then on the DNA level we       must have the motion periodic.              This means that if you see galaxies are moving away, them it must come into a       cycle, means no expansion of the universe.              I have accepted speed of light to be constant around the earth.              Outside of it we do not know, and Riccati DNA is unlikely to support it.              With current technology, it takes at least 60000 (This is thousands) years to       reach to the nearest star (See my book).              DNA of mathematics will eventually make it available millions of new equations       to be solved in closed forms.              These in turn makes space travel much faster in the future, also its DNA       analysis will support medical research on DNA of cells.              Thus, mathematicians have their own laboratory to say something about the       Universe.              The resistance of the math community relative to this new science in any form       or behavior will be only for short periods of time.              Sincerely              Dr. Mehran Basti              PS: Read the book, see other issues discussed there. And you will see that the       control of mathematicians in the academic institution, will be a matter of       grave concern for the establishment.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca